X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 09:29:17 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from zhbdzmsp-smta15.bluewin.ch ([195.186.99.132] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5141814 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:56:23 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=195.186.99.132; envelope-from=patrick.hayoz@bluemail.ch X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [195.186.99.6] ([195.186.99.6:13289] helo=zhbdzmsp-smta13.bluewin.ch) by zhbdzmsp-smta15.bluewin.ch (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 45/7B-09728-4DC268E4; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:55:48 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.33] (178.192.63.1) by zhbdzmsp-smta13.bluewin.ch (8.5.142) (authenticated as patrick.hayoz@bluemail.ch) id 4E6F42930037FB6B for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:55:48 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805 X-Original-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:53:23 +0200 Subject: Question regarding EMS (JPI, Dynon...) From: Patrick Hayoz X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Question regarding EMS (JPI, Dynon...) In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3400267935_1314478" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3400267935_1314478 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hello to all, My engine monitoring system is a Vision Microsystems (VM) EPI 800 and worke= d well for the last eight years =AD and still works fine. I'm thinking of a replacement system =AD in case of a major failure of the actual system. My recent research showed that most of the installed sensors are compatible with the EMS used today. Fuelprobe compatibility? Does anybody knows about the compatibility of the VM Fuel probes? I have tw= o of them installed in the wings. A calibration was done back in 2002 to respect of the Fueltank geometry=8A Which system to for? What are y
Hello to all,

=
My engine monitoring system is a Vision Microsystems (VM) EPI 800= and worked
well for the last eight years – and still works = fine.

I'm thinking of a replacement system – = in case of a major failure of the actual system.

My= recent research showed that most of the installed sensors are compatible wi= th the
EMS used today.

Fuelprobe compa= tibility?
Does anybody knows about the compatibility of the VM= Fuel probes? I have two of them
installed in the wings. A calibra= tion was done back in 2002 to respect of the Fueltank geometry…
<= div>
Which system to for?
What are y<our e= xperiences with JPI, Dynon and others?

Any hints an= d thoughts are welcome, thank you.

Patrick, LNC2, S= witzerland


--B_3400267935_1314478--