X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:25:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm40-vm6.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com ([72.30.239.214] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with SMTP id 5139608 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:58:04 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=72.30.239.214; envelope-from=flycassutts@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.212.150] by nm40.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2011 01:57:28 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.195] by tm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2011 01:57:28 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2011 01:57:28 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 790067.59178.bm@omp1004.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 98312 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2011 01:57:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QwfH1UIcna3gH15r4RVli2oNZzYrVcWJ/wYiBw4ZngqjvIX8OohHyC1Hno2eDC2kcijy+eS7no7om9kOi3J+tbf3u2Csw2WOKDNicNE9uc2/E0GHJQjpnB5YT6l8ZnLV7OQfSX9UlIMpzU6ZndiuDB6p4qLQQTlkRCzaEYToxs4=; X-YMail-OSG: C7HgOVUVM1n3LTcj8z.iRo3HODdNgBYjTOweE9JSnEL.Exq eoqkE9wwh9mo1xtpiHuQFSy_tPaJredbdqzBuloZXy2XZ7Q9rJ8Rk0yPCiYp WnXH5nRuvVIOeVy1P7eNAZFnLXiL4.JoVF9iJrBK.osM1EPqySVn3a7ef8yC yBe9_GXw.uDZP8vtGkMdL7G_aj5jJS_9OfHRtKy45TdutWOk36ApZEV7PsWx uNiSeuB025ffTkHGoWWwl7f7lsBZ.Osb.vGJgGkpWOMidok8Sn7lJmdL6XgW MAwFNd618v7R..mLXGiB.uolcgflb9nSZMnqpK4h7k0GlxTr4f0gd_.Ib8GD FVMz2TschTpcVi0MiaplLCpk6JyJfml9fusjpZiKLFdeJfiFh0M2niwM5nsz saxmeNkzSJM0jKjlEQwCe.cnJ0AIorCm6bMM6ZhysF_TtrmSISzj_Nm9b2hH qrgwEprVeg3NPYmrZ5bDTsLRh55zVYVGh6axZ7Xi5QdrImEV1dNhH3lSiAH2 zGCvEMnDFTlh.JFZffAZNTxiqI9gXUTGgNiCL Received: from [184.99.202.125] by web160819.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:57:28 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.114.317681 References: X-Original-Message-ID: <1317261448.95985.YahooMailNeo@web160819.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:57:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Art Jensen Reply-To: Art Jensen Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Chelton??and more... X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-2086189737-936506509-1317261448=:95985" ---2086189737-936506509-1317261448=:95985 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mike,=0A=C2=A0=0ATo be sure, it is not a social club.=C2=A0 Over the years = we have come to better understand our systems and when there is a need for = information, you have a site which to explore for answers or to ask if not = already archived.=0A=C2=A0=0AArt=0A=0AFrom: Tim Olson =0ATo= : lml@lancaironline.net=0ASent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:12 PM=0ASub= ject: [LML] Re: Chelton??and more...=0A=0AGeez Mike, I don't know....but wh= en I look, I see that between the=0A4 main sections, there are 360 topic, w= ith over 2500 posts, and the most=0Arecent was today, with the one before t= hat being the end of the week=0Alast week.=C2=A0 I know it's not a super ac= tive forum, but it is a place=0Ato go that people actually watch and answer= questions related to=0Athe system.=C2=A0 My biggest question is, with the = system being so very=0Agood at navigation, what's the big benefit to even h= aving the 2=0Asystems transfer flight plans.=C2=A0 I leave my 480 set to ei= ther GPS=0Adirect mode to destination, or sometimes when I'm bored I punch= =0Ain all the legs and keep both systems running.=C2=A0 But when push=0Acom= es to shove, I'm happy to just do it all on the Chelton without=0Adealing w= ith the other boxes.=C2=A0 No, it's not going to be upgraded=0Aand turn int= o a current system, but it still does very well if=0Ayou consider both navi= gational features, and it's very organized=0Aand clean, easy to read displa= y.=C2=A0 It's really not that tough of=0Aa decision...if you don't like wha= t it has to offer, just ditch it=0Aand get the thing you do like.=C2=A0 I p= icked up a whole new system from=0Asomeone who was in that boat, and now ha= ve one that I got at a=0Agreat price to put in my next kit if I choose to b= uild another...and=0Auntil then, it's a great 100% complete spare to what I= have.=0A=0ATim=0A=0A=0AOn 9/28/2011 5:25 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:=0A> Th= anks Bob, I=E2=80=99m a member of that forum, but it=E2=80=99s dead.=C2=A0 = 47 total posts=0A> in 4 years, and the last post was six months ago.=C2=A0 = That, in part, is=0A> what is making me think the Chelton is becoming outda= ted before I=E2=80=99ve=0A> even gotten around to installing it!=0A>=0A> Mi= ke=0A>=0A> *From:*Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] *On B= ehalf Of=0A> *Robert R Pastusek=0A> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9= :37 AM=0A> *To:* lml@lancaironline.net=0A> *Subject:* [LML] Re: Chelton??an= d more...=0A>=0A> Michael,=0A>=0A> Take a look on www.CheltonEFISpilots.com= =0A> for good info about the Chelton sys= tem.=0A>=0A>=0A> Bob=0A>=0A> *From:*Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancai= ronline.net] *On Behalf Of=0A> *Michael McMahon=0A> *Sent:* Wednesday, Sept= ember 28, 2011 7:50 AM=0A> *To:* lml@lancaironline.net=0A> *Subject:* [LML]= Re: Chelton??and more...=0A>=0A> I have a dual screen experimental version= still in the shipping box,=0A> unopened. Does anyone know if there are pla= ns to make the Chelton talk=0A> to the new Garmins? I=E2=80=99ve searched o= nline and haven=E2=80=99t been able to find=0A> an active Chelton user grou= p or forum and I=E2=80=99m evaluating whether it=E2=80=99s=0A> worth instal= ling the Chelton system or has the technology evolved enough=0A> to make th= em outdated? If anyone knows a more appropriate forum for this=0A> question= , please pass it on.=0A>=0A> Thanks,=0A>=0A> Michael=0A>=0A=0A=0A--=0AFor a= rchives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ---2086189737-936506509-1317261448=:95985 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mike,
 
To be sure, it is not a social club.  Over the years we have= come to better understand our systems and when there is a need for informa= tion, you have a site which to explore for answers or to ask if not already= archived.
 
Art

From:= Tim Olson <Tim@myrv10.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 6:12 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Chelton??and = more...

Geez Mike, I don't know....but when I look, I see tha= t between the
4 main sections, there are 360 topic, with over 2500 posts= , and the most
recent was today, with the one before that being the end = of the week
last week.  I know it's not a super active forum, but i= t is a place
to go that people actually watch and answer questions related to<= BR>the system.  My biggest question is, with the system being so very<= BR>good at navigation, what's the big benefit to even having the 2
syste= ms transfer flight plans.  I leave my 480 set to either GPS
direct = mode to destination, or sometimes when I'm bored I punch
in all the legs= and keep both systems running.  But when push
comes to shove, I'm = happy to just do it all on the Chelton without
dealing with the other bo= xes.  No, it's not going to be upgraded
and turn into a current sys= tem, but it still does very well if
you consider both navigational featu= res, and it's very organized
and clean, easy to read display.  It's= really not that tough of
a decision...if you don't like what it has to = offer, just ditch it
and get the thing you do like.  I picked up a = whole new system from
someone who was in that boat, and now have one that I got at a
great price to put in my next kit if I choose to bu= ild another...and
until then, it's a great 100% complete spare to what I= have.

Tim


On 9/28/2011 5:25 PM, Michael McMahon wrote:> Thanks Bob, I=E2=80=99m a member of that forum, but it=E2=80=99s dea= d.  47 total posts
> in 4 years, and the last post was six month= s ago.  That, in part, is
> what is making me think the Chelton = is becoming outdated before I=E2=80=99ve
> even gotten around to inst= alling it!
>
> Mike
>
> *From:*Lancair Mailing List= [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] *On Behalf Of
> *Robert R = Pastusek
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:37 AM
> *To:= * lml@lancaironline.net
> *Subject:* [LML] Re: Chelton??an= d more...
>
> Michael,
>
> Take a look on www.Chelto= nEFISpilots.com
> <http://www.CheltonEFISpilots.com> for good info about= the Chelton system.
>
>
> Bob
>
> *From:*Lan= cair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] *On Behalf Of<= BR>> *Michael McMahon
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2011 7:50= AM
> *To:* lml@lancaironline.net
> *Subject:* [LML]= Re: Chelton??and more...
>
> I have a dual screen experimental= version still in the shipping box,
> unopened. Does anyone know if t= here are plans to make the Chelton talk
> to the new Garmins? I=E2=80= =99ve searched online and haven=E2=80=99t been able to find
> an acti= ve Chelton user group or forum and I=E2=80=99m evaluating whether it=E2=80=99s
> wor= th installing the Chelton system or has the technology evolved enough
&g= t; to make them outdated? If anyone knows a more appropriate forum for this=
> question, please pass it on.
>
> Thanks,
>
&g= t; Michael
>


--
For archives and unsub http://mai= l.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html


---2086189737-936506509-1317261448=:95985--