X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 08:38:57 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm13-vm0.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.44.160] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with SMTP id 5060458 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:59:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.44.160; envelope-from=c177av8r@pacbell.net Received: from [98.139.44.107] by nm13.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jul 2011 17:59:20 -0000 Received: from [98.139.44.80] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jul 2011 17:59:20 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1017.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jul 2011 17:59:20 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 569457.34735.bm@omp1017.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 29016 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jul 2011 17:59:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cCYcRdLP92FN7rFgoduWf/uUvtvg/nVGfObhj3xzjeHqIFwM5jhDiUqbTNsSwYMXIPg5P/ioopHOjcoqptGjyIZchIqkgd6Z0kWGUtMklt5JFYSiyrF7PJK0qCrVEDbuAK2qSeOcdGG7hV0qqqJjIarxdBh92m+jgYwjUQ1hUaM=; X-YMail-OSG: nqayJJ0VM1l9KLfbBP_voLsQvgZYOoI4E2ER9jnMCVPa4O8 g7O3VeQIS Received: from [24.4.113.93] by web180305.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:59:19 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.3 YahooMailWebService/0.8.112.307740 X-Original-Message-ID: <1311357559.59310.YahooMailClassic@web180305.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:59:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Duane Allen Subject: TIS or not X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1029098333-1311357559=:59310" --0-1029098333-1311357559=:59310 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable am i correct in these assumptions or should i spend more cash for a =0Ahigh= er end transponder with more capabilities?=A0 also, is it worth it to =0Asp= end the cash and have a backup transponder now? suggestions? I have two GNS430s with TIS and fly a Beech with TCAD and TIS.=A0 The TCAD = shows up on the MX20 and the TIS on the 430.=A0 I find it frustrating that = they announce traffic (or traffic not available).=A0 I spend too much time = looking for that traffic.=A0 I fly in the SF Bay Area where we have modes s= ervices. My biggest problem with the transponder was lack of visibility.=A0 We=A0 in= stalled an external antenna and no problems since.=A0 We will see what happ= ens in the wide open expanse on the way to OSH. BTW, I have an empty room at OSH if someone needs a place to stay.=A0 One o= f my passengers cancelled. duane es39wg --0-1029098333-1311357559=:59310 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

am i correct in these assumptions or shou= ld i spend more cash for a =0Ahigher end transponder with more capabilities= ?  also, is it worth it to =0Aspend the cash and have a backup transpo= nder now?

suggestions?

I have two GNS430s with TIS and fly a = Beech with TCAD and TIS.  The TCAD shows up on the MX20 and the TIS on= the 430.  I find it frustrating that they announce traffic (or traffi= c not available).  I spend too much time looking for that traffic.&nbs= p; I fly in the SF Bay Area where we have modes services.

My biggest= problem with the transponder was lack of visibility.  We  instal= led an external antenna and no problems since.  We will see what happe= ns in the wide open expanse on the way to OSH.

BTW, I have an empty = room at OSH if someone needs a place to stay.  One of my passengers ca= ncelled.

duane es39wg

--0-1029098333-1311357559=:59310--