X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:19:39 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5050373@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <RWolf99@aol.com>
Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.145] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0)
  with ESMTP id 5050116 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:21:21 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.145; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com
Received: from imo-da03.mx.aol.com (imo-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.201])
	by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p6D5Ketp017041
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:20:40 -0400
Received: from RWolf99@aol.com
	by imo-da03.mx.aol.com  (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.10fd.37fd08e (55728)
	 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:20:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtprly-me02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-me02.mx.aol.com [64.12.95.103]) by cia-md03.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD033-b2cd4e1d2b202f6; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:20:35 -0400
Received: from webmail-d070 (webmail-d070.sim.aol.com [205.188.92.108]) by smtprly-me02.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYME025-b2cd4e1d2b202f6; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:20:32 -0400
X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Certified vs Experimental Flight Hours
X-Original-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:20:32 -0400
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
X-AOL-IP: 174.18.250.152
X-MB-Message-Type: User
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: rwolf99@aol.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
 boundary="--------MB_8CE0F33B8AB002F_17B4_471A7_webmail-d070.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33953-STANDARD
Received: from 174.18.250.152 by webmail-d070.sysops.aol.com (205.188.92.108) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:20:32 -0400
X-Original-Message-Id: <8CE0F33B8A63D69-17B4-1F8AD@webmail-d070.sysops.aol.com>
X-Spam-Flag:NO
X-AOL-SENDER: RWolf99@aol.com


----------MB_8CE0F33B8AB002F_17B4_471A7_webmail-d070.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Randy writes:

<<I believe there are more flight hours per plane for experimentals that=
 certifieds...>>

I don't see how that could be.  One year at Oshkosh there was a special di=
splay area for homebuilts with over 1000 hours.  There were just a handful=
.  Bill Hannahan's Lancair was one of them.  On the other side of the runw=
ay were thousands of spam-cans, all certified.  I'll bet that none had les=
s than 1000 hours, and most had more than 2000 hours.

Further, every experimental for sale in Trade-a-Plane or ASO.com seems to=
 have between 100 and maybe 500 hours.  Virtually all spam cans have thous=
ands.

As to the real question -- do homebuilt owners fly their airplanes more ho=
urs per year than spam can owners -- I have no idea.

- Rob Wolf

p.s.  I do not use the term "spam can" as pejorative.  I used to own one=
 and had a lot of fun with it.




=3D

----------MB_8CE0F33B8AB002F_17B4_471A7_webmail-d070.sysops.aol.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<font color=3D'black' size=3D'2' face=3D'arial'>
<div>Randy writes:</div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div>&lt;&lt;I believe there are more flight hours per plane for experimen=
tals that certifieds...&gt;&gt;</div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div>I don't see how that could be.&nbsp; One year at Oshkosh there was a=
 special display area for homebuilts with over 1000 hours.&nbsp; There wer=
e just a handful.&nbsp; Bill Hannahan's Lancair was one of them.&nbsp;&nbs=
p;On the other side of the runway were thousands of spam-cans, all certifi=
ed.&nbsp; I'll bet that none had less than 1000 hours, and most had more=
 than 2000 hours.</div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div>Further, every experimental for sale in Trade-a-Plane or ASO.com seem=
s to have between 100 and maybe 500 hours.&nbsp; Virtually all spam cans=
 have thousands.</div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div>As to the real question -- do homebuilt owners fly their airplanes mo=
re hours per year&nbsp;than spam can owners -- I have no idea.</div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div>- Rob Wolf</div>


<div>&nbsp;</div>


<div>p.s.&nbsp; I do not use the term "spam can" as pejorative.&nbsp; I us=
ed to own one and had a lot of fun with it.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>


<div style=3D"CLEAR: both"></div>
</font>

----------MB_8CE0F33B8AB002F_17B4_471A7_webmail-d070.sysops.aol.com--