|
|
|
See pages 10-14 of the January 2011 issue. I will have it posted separately as well.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Sky2high@aol.com
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Mon, Jul 11, 2011 8:44 am
Subject: [LML] Re: another Lancair
Jeff,
I couldn't find anything useful either in a scan of news letters or under the button "safety". The Safety Wire article was too small to read and is missing page 3. How ridiculous that the EAA reserved safety info only for counselors. Oh well.........
I have attached Lee Metcalf's Lancair accident analyses thru 2005 and the copy of an article I had laying around that points out why one should be suspicious of "experimental" accident stats. Perhaps the community will find these interesting.
Scott
In a message dated 7/10/2011 2:18:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, vtailjeff@aol.com writes:
Scott,
The summary and white paper is on the web site. lobo is now deeply involved in other EAA and FAA aviation safety projects.
Best regards,
Jeff
Sent from my iPad
Jeff,
Any analysis is of interest to all - especially those that can't make your session at OSH. Perhaps some summary at the LOBO site?
Scott Krueger
In a message dated 7/8/2011 7:40:41 A.M. Central Daylight Time, vtailjeff@aol.com writes:
Mark,
Yes, LOBO tracks these matters. Have you ever been to Oshkosh Airventure? These accidents are discussed in detail there. Based on your comments about the engines you would be surprised. In many cases it was not the engine.
Jeff Edwards
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Steitle < msteitle@gmail.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Thu, Jul 7, 2011 4:59 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: another Lancair
Steve,
I agree, the pilot community lost another great guy. Even if he was a jerk, we still need to solve this riddle. Is LOBO following up on each of these crashes to learn what the experts determine to be the cause(s)? If not, we'll continue to be having these conversations until we eventually run out of pilots, or airplanes.
Mark
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Steve Colwell <mcmess1919@yahoo.com> wrote:
I would sure would like to know why all of these "certified engines" are quitting on takeoff.
Mark S.
Maybe the engine driven fuel pump is failing. We are running low boost continuously in case the engine pump fails and to address fuel pressure issues at altitude, hot fuel, vapor lock and other problems.
I understand the engine will not make full power on low boost (reduce manifold pressure and settle for less power?)
Or, it might quit if high boost is on and the mixture is not adjusted.
Since engine driven pump failure, heat and altitude all affect fuel delivery, it would seem using the low boost continuously could solve or make these problems manageable.
Dr. Lyle Koen did our last two physicals. He was a very likeable guy who built one of the early IV’s and had over 1000 hours on it. We talked to him about joining LOBO and coming to the Branson Fly-In.
Given the more knowledgeable than usual witness account, could training have changed this outcome?
Steve Legacy IO550
=
|
|