Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #58413
From: swaid rahn <indigoaviation@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Piston vs turbine?
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 08:32:49 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Hi Dave,
 I miss spoke about the flight levels and I apologize. What I meant was up to  FL290. We will not be RVSM Qual.
I have about 175 hours behind a Walter 601E also. We have a cabin pressure that goes above 10K when we reach FL22-FL23. I have been told we have a cabin leak which may be true but we also are using plenum air to cool the generator with a 2.5 in duct which I was told was unnecessary. The bottom  line is we need a stronger compressor in the walter to make power at FL270 and above.
 I would prefer a turbine that was more fuel efficient, had a high altitude compressor, 3+ times the TBO, more plentiful in the US, and no metric hardware.
 I am not saying there is anything wrong with the Walter powered 4P, I am just looking for better like everyone here. Isn't that why we fly experimental acft instead of spam can factory built?
Swaid Rahn

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:39 PM, <davelink2001@comcast.net> wrote:
Have 437 hours on a Walter 601E. Very happy with the package.

Dave.



--
Swaid L. Rahn
Indigo Aviation, Inc.
940 Mock Road
Springfield, Ga. 31329
Cell 912.655.0966


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster