X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:36:04 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-4958257@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <fluffysheap@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-iy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j)
  with ESMTPS id 4958216 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:05:40 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=fluffysheap@gmail.com
Received: by iyf40 with SMTP id 40so1559980iyf.25
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=PHzqaBfTZYkrYdUzxxTHi3x2DKfwRK/kcECE6mE58yJfrfvZ+FkwQoIKiSbe2h17Ri
         d3vSJ58oQwFcrMEy2vBELWvJgUwMfBs8mX30OkXX9BHwZjWwlhh/E3L/inCTmzNkGhQD
         6T8v6bZQS7gIwCiHFUdjdQoszdEkWmHo67AKQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.153.133 with SMTP id m5mr1533536icw.27.1303848305562; Tue,
 26 Apr 2011 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.172.83 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-4957923@logan.com>
References: <list-4957923@logan.com>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:05:05 -0600
X-Original-Message-ID: <BANLkTi=KvhZtSE25Ody4LVt5tNaSpDtJEg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Searches
From: William Wilson <fluffysheap@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e837618167a04a1d7d7d7

--90e6ba6e837618167a04a1d7d7d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is just not true at all.  Giving up rights does not make you safer.
Most people in the government, and many not in the government do not
understand, or more likely just choose not to believe that (most of the
government sees their job to destroy as many rights as possible, with the
hope that safety is a side benefit).

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek@htii.com>wrot=
e:

>  It=92s always a balance between citizen rights and citizen protection; s=
ome
> are arguing that their =93protection responsibility=94 over-writes some c=
urrent
> rights.
>

--90e6ba6e837618167a04a1d7d7d7
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This is just not true at all.=A0 Giving up rights does not make you safer.=
=A0 Most people in the government, and many not in the government do not un=
derstand, or more likely just choose not to believe that (most of the gover=
nment sees their job to destroy as many rights as possible, with the hope t=
hat safety is a side benefit).<br>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Robert R Pa=
stusek <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rpastusek@htii.com">rpastuse=
k@htii.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); p=
adding-left: 1ex;">
<div link=3D"blue" vlink=3D"purple" lang=3D"EN-US"><div><span style=3D"font=
-size: 11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);">=A0It=92s always a balance between c=
itizen rights and citizen protection; some are arguing that their =93protec=
tion responsibility=94 over-writes some current rights.</span><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div>

--90e6ba6e837618167a04a1d7d7d7--