X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:23:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.97] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with SMTP id 4943501 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:50:44 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.97; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.91.61] by nm27.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Apr 2011 01:50:09 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.8] by tm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Apr 2011 01:50:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1008.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Apr 2011 01:50:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 802517.70937.bm@omp1008.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 59191 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Apr 2011 01:50:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1+TJ/c6OqDUGea0oy1aFAF0Aq3bcmS+rCZA8CGk6hweu3aSyKQtNAAz6+q0x4yj7k+I0ECMZe9ezvflYX+XuxkdnR2o+ECsQGGTYu9bqMVN1fNstZWE8nW5n3DjlbJn3TUcnIHVSgXpvU+NZ4nNJ5OHOel5k7SYrRE3o27q/8BA=; X-Original-Message-ID: <298719.54449.qm@web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 1NbRNi0VM1lZbIcYASgtNj1.2bD1wMOywCJ8yaBp80Ux2Uk eTrvdiArEk.2HvmUnlolRf7J4_IvHckNV.6iPRAgUAOPCVp_l4UXfaNSr3ri T_SNsgOu1xuypkGA9K03jCLkmd1Nz6woLfWxPqghpUGgvL5dU04WX9X4mvMI b7_dcTFh2ZC2lO2p7KxGpN728lR7M.SKtR78VFPfXrAXWDHQezjzwC1MUUdc yax1_EhLmXoBa.vHhaHZB8QUcbDU0CbtgDqCcgyO0WvonDp1K8PO81tikiUJ zRmMHgvjN5H9cSEbaReSFWwMJ7w6lSDMQRxDSq_5l23fUJuyoo5QdYVQI_eE 1LXT6YdBK.3r1aNiifJrpM5Lz98pXtvXZysf7sBBjJx5EY0WJdeAsi9qi4nT jywoWS2hisVIp.1g3_A-- Received: from [76.8.220.21] by web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:50:08 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:50:08 -0700 (PDT) From: randy snarr Subject: Re: [LML] Fuel probes X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1854464782-1302573008=:54449" --0-1854464782-1302573008=:54449 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Neil, I Measure the header only. I took Gary Edwards advice and did not put probe= s in the wings as everyone complains about their accuracy.. I use a fuel ta= ntalizer and have never missed the gages on the wings... That only works if you have a header tank...of course.. Randy Snarr "Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if n= ot utterly impossible" -Simon Newcomb, 1902 --- On Mon, 4/11/11, Neil Postle wrote: From: Neil Postle Subject: [LML] Fuel probes To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Monday, April 11, 2011, 1:29 PM =A0=A0=A0 I'm close to closing out my 360 wings=A0 and would like to know i= f the Princeton probes will read linerary with the extended tanks. What is the most common fuel probes for the 360. Are they effected by the slosh bay at wing station 57?=A0 I have Princeton probes and IK Tech. Aim 3000 engine monitor in my Rebel and they work great. I have to make a desision on the extended wing tips. Can't see many down sides here in the mountians with 8000 ft mountians on 3 sides of my strip within 30 miles =A0=A0=A0 Finally working on my 360 FB MK-ll, outback gear, after sitting i= n my shop for 17 years. Neil Postle 800 Northfork rd. Cherryvill, B.C. V0E 2G3 (250) 547- 9642 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --0-1854464782-1302573008=:54449 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Neil,
I Measure the header only. I took Ga= ry Edwards advice and did not put probes in the wings as everyone complains= about their accuracy.. I use a fuel tantalizer and have never missed the g= ages on the wings...
That only works if you have a header tank...of cour= se..

Randy Snarr

"Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant,= if not utterly impossible"
-Simon Newcomb, 1902

--- On Mon, 4/11/11, Neil Postle <npostle@xplornet.com> wrote:

From: Neil Postle <npostle@xplornet.com&g= t;
Subject: [LML] Fuel probes
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mond= ay, April 11, 2011, 1:29 PM

  &nb= sp; I'm close to closing out my 360 wings  and would like to know if the
P= rinceton probes will read linerary with the extended tanks. What is the
= most common fuel probes for the 360. Are they effected by the slosh bay at<= br>wing station 57?  I have Princeton probes and IK Tech. Aim 3000 eng= ine
monitor in my Rebel and they work great. I have to make a desision o= n the
extended wing tips. Can't see many down sides here in the mountian= s with
8000 ft mountians on 3 sides of my strip within 30 miles
 = ;   Finally working on my 360 FB MK-ll, outback gear, after sitti= ng in my shop
for 17 years.


Neil Postle
800 Northfork rd.<= br>Cherryvill, B.C.
V0E 2G3
(250) 547- 9642


--
For arch= ives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html=
--0-1854464782-1302573008=:54449--