X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:57:11 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from wolverine.webiness.com ([65.61.103.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2a) with ESMTPS id 4823020 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:49:56 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.61.103.66; envelope-from=brent@regandesigns.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=regandesigns.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=rE4u0+5qT/3qBu1hkpyBJ/DQO9ZkVNlyJXh3aSVVowWxtonuWW0pqQIWyED70cPvaMQOaBG5ktlZHo1BGkwsJ50NE+X6+3Cii47J8WUg6gVcBW6DpdAOpuzC32bVTaQj; Received: from 207-170-226-178.static.twtelecom.net ([207.170.226.178] helo=[192.168.1.145]) by wolverine.webiness.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PgmGl-0007g2-Rk for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:49:19 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <4D3B5EEA.6060704@regandesigns.com> X-Original-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 14:49:14 -0800 From: Brent Regan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: Lithium Batteries Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wolverine.webiness.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - regandesigns.com Michael writes: <<>> I would caution that taking anecdotal "test" reports published on a blog as fact is a bit of a risk. Having a guy by the name of "Tostino" report he did a "few" discharge cycles with no observable imbalance tells us nothing. It certainly is not enough to contravene the battery manufacturer's published recommendations. How many cycles? What was the temperature? What was the rate of discharge and the depth of discharge? How was it measured? What was the rate of charge? What was the charge temperature? Did the discharge rate vary (like in an aircraft application)? Hamid, on the other hand, has actually designed multi cell Li-ion and LiFePo power systems. One system was for Liquid Robotics http://liquidr.com and featured seven 6-cell packs that powered the electronics and payload of the Wave Glider (winner of the WSJ Innovation of the Year award). Photovoltaic panels were used to charge the batteries in sequence during sunlight hours. The prototypes we built for Liquid Robotics have logged thousands of charge - discharge cycles during several trans Pacific crossings and deployments from Baja to Alaska without any failures. Reliability is, in part, the result of careful consideration of theoretical extremes. This frequently produces favorable real world experiences. So, believe who you want, a guy who has 15 years experience designing scores of high reliability electromechanical systems including certified primary flight displays, Electronic Flight Bags and power systems for AUVs or a guy named Tostino you met online. Oh, and here is another clue that implementing a Lithium battery power system is non-trivial; most cell manufacturers won't sell you the bare cells until they qualify your safety circuit. Regards Brent Regan