X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:50:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([67.195.15.210] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.9) with SMTP id 4487660 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:38:25 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=67.195.15.210; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 76646 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Sep 2010 16:37:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4TjKCVHjdjLb5OsukoJom8leyCtleE5GnwOtDpd6XrKM8CQD1D82jo7Da5S7vmPIvt05+H8eRh1ieZBfS6i9mtoQHsr7rT3xB2f8xwTVQcBz9XN8w0wrvJdgUIw5YBRYEvoe1qY4Z8Yn4hYxlolzH1GL8PGdvz6lEF78JexaxyM=; X-Original-Message-ID: <356574.76541.qm@web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: hLNjnSgVM1nPFqFaXFzHFjyj2g6hRmDDxRe_8_o9uVqJXdB WC3UdOI7Jokv9GDargoLm5lfrj2No7rGVJrEa6lJ.oBXG3m4sE49x5UUPnl9 dZ4CYDOJUzzK5w1S9CvkRrG5_TvKZscw657jSHMRLNsVBd3stzWddiVWYPYD JlSQwPSskCVw3PLoQsZ0AvCyvbRZrKEYuhYT3xyxEUa6eXQvuifh6Wio3fE0 d8bvul6O5f0r8VYnYU.usVEbs27aBMEIUXkL5GutaS5lwr0J7WxZm_49839C OKtlzMiCfLxyGRDmtJ0nAAdJdX8o5tnV3EE.5MWGgK_xjUB8anBaC6rDFR3r TL.tRZam.ePZctTO5HHjv9eaXuOM3m1uO9EANyg-- Received: from [76.8.220.21] by web111414.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:37:49 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 X-Original-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:37:49 -0700 (PDT) From: randy snarr Subject: Re: [LML] ong debonggers service X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-557337549-1285864669=:76541" --0-557337549-1285864669=:76541 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I flew with my friend a few weeks ago and noticed his debongers were much "softer" on landing than mine. I too would like to know how to adjust these correctly... Randy Snarr N694RS "Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if not utterly impossible" -Simon Newcomb, 1902 --- On Wed, 9/29/10, Terrence O'Neill wrote: From: Terrence O'Neill Subject: [LML] ong debonggers service To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 5:38 AM AT rest my Ong Debongers show about one inch of remaining travel available. They work nicely, but I think they're not extended as much as they should be. What pressure or stroke should be available... at empty weight? Or... whatever? Anybody? Many thanks. terrencde N211AL L235/320 80 hrs and increasing. -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --0-557337549-1285864669=:76541 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
I flew with my friend a few weeks ago and noticed his debongers were much "softer" on landing than mine.
I too would like to know how to adjust these correctly...

Randy Snarr
N694RS

"Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if not utterly impossible"
-Simon Newcomb, 1902

--- On Wed, 9/29/10, Terrence O'Neill <troneill@charter.net> wrote:

From: Terrence O'Neill <troneill@charter.net>
Subject: [LML] ong debonggers service
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 5:38 AM

AT rest my Ong Debongers show about one inch of remaining travel available. They work nicely, but I think they're not extended as much as they should be.
What pressure or stroke should be available... at empty weight? Or... whatever?
Anybody?
Many thanks.
terrencde
N211AL
L235/320
80 hrs and increasing.
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

--0-557337549-1285864669=:76541--