Return-Path: Received: from imo18.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.8]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA2614 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 12:22:56 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo18.mx.aol.com (IMOv16.10) id 8CKFa29193 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 1998 12:22:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com Message-ID: <9ee1fcad.36013741@aol.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 12:22:25 EDT To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Non-ferrous Electrical Conductor X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Help! My 320 electrical scheme includes passing power and ground thru the firewall via non-ferrous (copper alloy) bolts scrounged from the terminal posts of a master relay. This system is used because it provides for bus connections on either side of the firewall while also providing a seal between the engine compartment and the cockpit. Non-ferrous material is used so that no magnetism is created as has been reported when steel bolts are used. Because these are short bolts, I cannot use enough nuts to lock the bolt onto the firewall with a certain pressure and also securely fasten to terminals to either end. Also, I cannot over-torque the + bolt for fear of breaking the phenolic T-bushing used to isolate the circuit from the stainless steel firewall. I believe the lack of a "good" connection is causing minor problems under the vibration environment during flight. Does anyone know where I might obtain non-ferrous (copper alloy?) threaded rod material or a solid rod of a bolt diameter that I could thread? Scott Krueger N92EX