Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #55585
From: N320G <n320g@hotmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:04:32 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
I agree!  1050 hours and never an issue.
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:28 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail

Well said, Bill Rumburg!!!  Don’t mess up a good thing. 

 

Pete Field

320, Small Tail

N775DX, St. Louis

 


From: William Rumburg [mailto:lancair403@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 5:45 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] 320/360 MK II tail

 

Many have cut off (and continue to cut off) the original 320  'small' elevator/horizontal stabilizer. The 320/360 is a sport plane and it's a shame to cut off or abandon the origional elevator/horizontal stabilizer and replace it with the heavy MK II elevator/horizontal stabilizer, turning it into a 'Cessna', as dictated by the Austalian CAA ...a SHAME!

I built and have flown a 320 with the original elevator/horizontal stabilizer for twelve years. It's a sport plane and NOT a Cessna!
 

Bill Rumburg

n403Wr (Sonic bOOm)

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster