X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:04:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from snt0-omc3-s31.snt0.hotmail.com ([65.55.90.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTP id 4378359 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:55:54 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.90.170; envelope-from=n320g@hotmail.com Received: from SNT119-DS24 ([65.55.90.137]) by snt0-omc3-s31.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 06:55:17 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [99.185.1.170] X-Originating-Email: [n320g@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: n320g@hotmail.com From: "N320G" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 06:55:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00F5_01CB19B3.851EF4F0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8064.206 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8064.206 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2010 13:55:17.0813 (UTC) FILETIME=[3427DE50:01CB19EE] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00F5_01CB19B3.851EF4F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree! 1050 hours and never an issue. From: Peter Field=20 Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:28 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Subject: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail Well said, Bill Rumburg!!! Don't mess up a good thing. =20 =20 Pete Field 320, Small Tail N775DX, St. Louis =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: William Rumburg [mailto:lancair403@verizon.net]=20 Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 5:45 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] 320/360 MK II tail =20 Many have cut off (and continue to cut off) the original 320 'small' = elevator/horizontal stabilizer. The 320/360 is a sport plane and it's a = shame to cut off or abandon the origional elevator/horizontal stabilizer = and replace it with the heavy MK II elevator/horizontal stabilizer, = turning it into a 'Cessna', as dictated by the Austalian CAA ...a SHAME! = I built and have flown a 320 with the original elevator/horizontal = stabilizer for twelve years. It's a sport plane and NOT a Cessna! =20 Bill Rumburg n403Wr (Sonic bOOm) ------=_NextPart_000_00F5_01CB19B3.851EF4F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I agree!  1050 hours and never an=20 issue.
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 4:28 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail

Well said, = Bill=20 Rumburg!!!  Don=92t mess up a good thing. =20

 

Pete=20 Field

320, Small=20 Tail

N775DX, = St.=20 Louis

 

From: William=20 Rumburg [mailto:lancair403@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 = 5:45=20 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] 320/360 MK II=20 tail

 

Many have cut off (and continue to cut off) = the=20 original 320  'small' elevator/horizontal stabilizer. The 320/360 = is=20 a sport plane and it's a shame = to cut off=20 or abandon the origional elevator/horizontal stabilizer=20 and replace it with the heavy MK II elevator/horizontal = stabilizer,=20 turning it into a 'Cessna', as dictated by the Austalian CAA = ...a SHAME!=20

I built and have flown a 320 with = the=20 original elevator/horizontal stabilizer for twelve years. It's a = sport=20 plane and NOT a Cessna!
 

Bill = Rumburg

n403Wr (Sonic=20 = bOOm)

= ------=_NextPart_000_00F5_01CB19B3.851EF4F0--