X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:04:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from snt0-omc3-s20.snt0.hotmail.com ([65.55.90.159] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.8) with ESMTP id 4378520 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:28:09 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.90.159; envelope-from=bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Received: from SNT139-W30 ([65.55.90.135]) by snt0-omc3-s20.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:27:35 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: bill_kennedy_3@hotmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_f13f91c3-8df6-41ef-a60e-fd44527e0d11_" X-Originating-IP: [71.111.125.230] From: Bill Kennedy X-Original-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 08:27:35 -0700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2010 15:27:35.0076 (UTC) FILETIME=[189F2640:01CB19FB] --_f13f91c3-8df6-41ef-a60e-fd44527e0d11_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've got the larger=2C carbon fiber tail on my 320. In spite of your opinio= n=2C it doesn't seem much like any Cessna I've flown. My guess is that it f= lies a lot like the small tail version=2C except it has better elevator res= ponse over a broader speed range. Being carbon fiber=2C it may not have add= ed any weight=2C but I don't really know. My notion is that Lancair didn't "...mess up a good thing"=2C but fixed a b= ad thing. I've been very happy with the flying qualities of N42BK except fo= r its rather dramatic power off stall characteristics (which I cannot imagi= ne being any better with the small tail). Bill Kennedy N42BK=2C 599.6=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri=2C 2 Jul 2010 07:28:51 -0400 From: anpfield@sbcglobal.net Subject: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tail Well said=2C Bill Rumburg!!! Don=92t mess up a good thing. =20 =20 Pete Field 320=2C Small Tail N775DX=2C St. Louis =20 From: William Rumburg [mailto:lancair403@verizon.net]=20 Sent: Thursday=2C July 01=2C 2010 5:45 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] 320/360 MK II tail =20 Many have cut off (and continue to cut off) the original 320 'small' elevator/horizontal stabilizer. The 320/360 is a sport plane and i= t's a shame to cut off or abandon the origional elevator/horizontal stabilizer and replace it with the heavy MK II elevator/horizontal stabilizer=2C turning it into a 'Cessna'=2C as dictated by the Austalian CAA ...a SHAME!= =20 I built and have flown a 320 with the original elevator/horizontal stabilizer for twelve years. It's a sport plane and NOT a Cessna! =20 Bill Rumburg n403Wr (Sonic bOOm) =20 _________________________________________________________________ The New Busy is not the old busy. Search=2C chat and e-mail from your inbox= . http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=3DPID28326::T:WLMTAGL:O= N:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3= --_f13f91c3-8df6-41ef-a60e-fd44527e0d11_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've got the larger=2C carbon fiber tail on my 320. In spite of your opinio= n=2C it doesn't seem much like any Cessna I've flown. My guess is that it f= lies a lot like the small tail version=2C except it has better elevator res= ponse over a broader speed range. Being carbon fiber=2C it may not have add= ed any weight=2C but I don't really know.

My notion is that Lancair = didn't "...mess up a good thing"=2C but fixed a bad thing. I've been very h= appy with the flying qualities of N42BK except for its rather dramatic powe= r off stall characteristics (which I cannot imagine being any better with t= he small tail).

Bill Kennedy
N42BK=2C 599.6

To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri=2C 2 Jul 2010 07:28:51 -0= 400
From: anpfield@sbcglobal.net
Subject: [LML] Re: 320/360 MK II tai= l

Well = said=2C Bill Rumburg!!! =3B Don=92t mess up a good thing. =3B

= =3B

Pete = Field

320= =2C Small Tail

N775D= X=2C St. Louis

= =3B

From: William Rumburg [mailto:lancair403@verizon.net]
Sent: Thursday=2C July 0= 1=2C 2010 5:45 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.ne= t
Subject: [LML] 320/360 M= K II tail

=3B

Many have cut off (and continue to cut off) the= original 320 =3B'small' elevator/horizontal stabilizer. The 320/360 is a =3Bsport plane and it's =3Ba shame to cut off or abandon the origional elevator/horizontal stabilizer and =3Breplace =3Bit with the heavy MK II elevator/horizontal stabi= lizer=2C turning it into a =3B'Cessna'=2C as dictated by the Austalian CAA ...a= =3BSHAME!

I built =3Band have flown a =3B320 with= the original elevator/horizontal stabilizer for twelve years. =3BIt's a sport plane = and NOT a Cessna!
=3B

Bill Rumburg

n403Wr (Sonic bOOm)

The New Busy is not the old busy. Search=2C c= hat and e-mail from your inbox. Get started. = --_f13f91c3-8df6-41ef-a60e-fd44527e0d11_--