X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:42:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-db02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.96] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.7) with ESMTP id 4341786 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:55:06 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.91.96; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-db02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o59HsUTd026571 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:54:30 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.e22.8494c88 (37091) for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:54:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-md03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-md03.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.156]) by cia-db07.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIADB071-d4384c0fd5502d; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:54:26 -0400 Received: from webmail-d024 (webmail-d024.sim.aol.com [205.188.181.18]) by smtprly-md03.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMD037-d4384c0fd5502d; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:54:24 -0400 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: LNC2 Landing Gear X-Original-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:54:23 -0400 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 174.18.201.31 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CCD613EE0CF018_1840_34B4_webmail-d024.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 31888-STANDARD Received: from 174.18.201.31 by webmail-d024.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.18) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:54:23 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CCD613EE082D54-1840-18D5@webmail-d024.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: RWolf99@aol.com ----------MB_8CCD613EE0CF018_1840_34B4_webmail-d024.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I believe that Scott is 100% on-point here. You need to make sure that th= e actuator is not pushing on the gear when fully extended -- the gear cyli= nder must fully bottom out. Same when retracted, although that's a little= more obvious since the wheel will be in the wrong spot. Scott's approach= is good. You pressurize the system and make sure that you can slip the= connecting bolt through. I mention pressurized since the cylinders are= slightly longer when hydraulic pressure forces the rod to one end. The= connection of the end plug to the barrel has some "give". I did this and= had to remanufacture my spacer sleeves to make it all work. One thing that was not mentioned, which I contributed to the ancient paper= LML which Jim and Linda Frantz administered before Marv, is that the nose= gear also needs to be able to swing freely when the gas strut and hydraul= ic cylinders are disconnected. The 320 has a bolt which pulls the nose st= rut mounting blocks together, and there is a sleeve which goes over the bo= lt to set the spacing between the blocks. If the sleeve is too short, the= blocks are too close and there is too much pressure on the pivot bearings= , creating friction which resists nose gear delpoyment. The actuator can= push through this friction but the gas strut cannot. The failure mode he= re is a secondary extension mechanism that will not do its job. - Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CCD613EE0CF018_1840_34B4_webmail-d024.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
I believe that Scott is 100% on-point here.  You need to make su= re that the actuator is not pushing on the gear when fully extended -- the= gear cylinder must fully bottom out.  Same when retracted, although= that's a little more obvious since the wheel will be in the wrong spot.&n= bsp; Scott's approach is good.  You pressurize the system and make su= re that you can slip the connecting bolt through.  I mention pressuri= zed since the cylinders are slightly longer when hydraulic pressure forces= the rod to one end.  The connection of the end plug to the barrel ha= s some "give".  I did this and had to remanufacture my spacer sleeves= to make it all work.
 
One thing that was not mentioned, which I contributed to the ancient= paper LML which Jim and Linda Frantz administered before Marv, is that th= e nose gear also needs to be able to swing freely when the gas strut and= hydraulic cylinders are disconnected.  The 320 has a bolt which pull= s the nose strut mounting blocks together, and there is a sleeve which goe= s over the bolt to set the spacing between the blocks.  If the sleeve= is too short, the blocks are too close and there is too much pressur= e on the pivot bearings, creating friction which resists nose gear delpoym= ent.  The actuator can push through this friction but the gas strut= cannot.  The failure mode here is a secondary extension mechanism th= at will not do its job.
- Rob Wolf
----------MB_8CCD613EE0CF018_1840_34B4_webmail-d024.sysops.aol.com--