X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:13:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.146] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.7) with ESMTP id 4341665 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:48:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.146; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com Received: from imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (imo-ma04.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.139]) by imr-da04.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o59Gm0rF026198 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:48:00 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-ma04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.def.ab51c5f (45496) for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:47:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.142]) by cia-mc08.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC083-5c554c0fc5ac27e; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:47:45 -0400 Received: from Webmail-d120 (webmail-d120.sim.aol.com [205.188.108.129]) by smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMA033-5c554c0fc5ac27e; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:47:40 -0400 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: LNC2 Nose Gear X-Original-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:47:40 -0400 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 174.18.201.31 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CCD60A9C1849E4_5298_152A_Webmail-d120.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 31888-STANDARD Received: from 174.18.201.31 by Webmail-d120.sysops.aol.com (205.188.108.129) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 09 Jun 2010 12:47:40 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CCD60A9C15E884-5298-CF2@Webmail-d120.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: RWolf99@aol.com ----------MB_8CCD60A9C1849E4_5298_152A_Webmail-d120.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Mark - Thanks for the detective work -- I'll be sure to check my airplane. There was a somewhat related service bulletin several years ago for the fa= st-build 320. The topic was the location of a phenolic hard point at the= top of the nose gear tunnel. The failure mode was different, with the an= chor point for the cylinder breaking out. Unrelated, except that the leng= th and travel of the cylinders is involved in both cases. - Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CCD60A9C1849E4_5298_152A_Webmail-d120.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Mark -
 
Thanks for the detective work -- I'll be sure to check my airplane.
 
There was a somewhat related service bulletin several years ago for= the fast-build 320.  The topic was the location of a phenolic hard= point at the top of the nose gear tunnel.  The failure mode was diff= erent, with the anchor point for the cylinder breaking out.  Unrelate= d, except that the length and travel of the cylinders is involved in both= cases.
 
- Rob Wolf

----------MB_8CCD60A9C1849E4_5298_152A_Webmail-d120.sysops.aol.com--