X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:57:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.56] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.7) with ESMTP id 4331714 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:52:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.56; envelope-from=rob@robmurawski.com Received: from omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.74]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id QGqL1e0051c6gX856HsEsh; Mon, 31 May 2010 17:52:14 +0000 Received: from wintermute.rob-home.local. ([76.120.153.140]) by omta23.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id QHsD1e008320h7Q3jHsEoa; Mon, 31 May 2010 17:52:14 +0000 Received: from darkside (darkside.rob-home.local [192.168.0.50]) by wintermute.rob-home.local. (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4VHq8Sb012958 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:52:08 -0400 From: "Rob Murawski" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Transfer Of Ownership X-Original-Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 13:52:08 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <002701cb00e9$fd12f890$f738e9b0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-Index: AcsAx2AKX3KxWgh4TFGuYtIsm5UaOQAH7Xgg X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: o4VHq8Sb012958 X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00) X-boxedgarlic-MailScanner-From: rob@robmurawski.com MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1275933128.66911@32j/qnv1BpcVM+5oTI65oA As someone who paid this $300, I'll give you my viewpoints. =20 > As a 320 builder/owner, I don't think (with not having seen the whole = document) my aircraft would come > under this "policy". I tried this as well and I was told it applies to all Lancair aircraft. = Before I purchased my kit, I called to ask if they still provided = support for the 320/360 series. I was told not only did they still = provide support, but they also still had parts. I was interested in = this because I was worried I might be missing components or some may = have failed depending on how they were stored. Further, I also assumed = that the factory produced newsletters or had some kind of contact with = kit owners. > 2. Kit Components sells aircraft kits and certain parts - not a whole = lot of them are available specific to > 200-300 series aircraft. Aerocrafters (a Kit Components related = company) will sell anything they have > to anyone. Since the Lancair web site links to "aerocraftparts.com" I had assumed = Kit Components and Aerocraft Parts were the same company. In fact, I = still don't quite understand the difference between them. The Aerocraft = website looks like it hasn't been updated in years. > 5. Support as provided by the Lancair web site (service bulletins, = etc) is available to anyone that goes > there. There is a builder's only portion that you only get access to if you are = a registered owner. I thought that the information would be more useful = than what is there. > 6. The LML is always available if proper initial access is requested. My welcome letter actually directed me to the LML. Although, I had = known about LML before I purchased the kit as I was doing research into = what to look for when buying a kit. Needless to say, I'm not too happy about it because, in my opinion, the = cost of support was built into the original selling price of the kit. = They are additionally imposing requirements on future buyers that were = not imposed on the original owner. I see no difference between me = finishing this kit and the guy who kept it in his garage for 10 years = just starting it now and finishing it. He wouldn't now just need to = agree to additional requirements and pay money for support, yet by just = transferring ownership to someone else, now they apply? -Rob