Return-Path: Received: from marvkaye.olsusa.com ([207.30.195.95]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 13:53:38 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20000511140116.0308cc50@olsusa.com> Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 14:01:16 -0400 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: Marvin Kaye Subject: IV-P window X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Posted for "Lance A. Neibauer" : For the benefit of all IV-P builders, I'll comment on what we found with the window that blew out of a IV-P a few weeks ago. A friend of the new owner brought the door to our facility for inspection and repair. It's worth noting that we have eight years of reliable service from not only the company IV-P but also many others in the field with lots of total hours (ours has around 2,000 hrs on it). With that said, the review of this incident emphasizes the extreme importance of doing the assembly work properly. We saw three key elements that we believe caused the breakage. 1. The larger holes were made in the window but soft plastic tubing was cut and inserted in the holes, with the bolts going through the tubing. The tubing was cut a bit short in length and the result was a hard epoxy "ledge" on one side of the upper bolt hole on the top rear latch location. This ridge was very "crisp" and about .050" - .070" high. More on this later. 2. The widow was not scuffed at all on a large portion of the surface along the entire rear vertical bond line as well as top and bottom bond lines, and appeared to have had no adhesion whatsoever along these surfaces. 3. The bond flange area was reduced overall by about 40- 50% - less than 1" in some areas. I feel it was a combination of all of the above that caused the break. With greatly reduced bond area and near zero bond integrity over much of the area that was left, a lot of the membrane stress could have been focused directly into the bolts. Had the bolt hole filler been consistent, that load would have been spread uniformly and they may have taken it but with the very soft tubing (taking virtually none of it) the small hard ridge at the rear hole quite likely saw a sharp stress rise locally. I don't think it was coincidence that the crack originated directly adjacent to that ridge. This information reinforces the fact that proper technique is very important and please don't adlib with techniques such as adding plastic tubing in bolt holes etc. If the steps are performed properly, the result is indeed proven reliability. While I'm on the subject, another general area of concern is that of potential small stress risers caused from burrs around a poorly drilled hole in the window. Please also pay particularly close attention to this. A light smoothing with approx. 400-grit sandpaper on the edges would help insure against such stress risers. Let's keep it safe. Lance >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>