X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:50:57 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-4031729@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <gwbraly@gami.com>
Received: from sfa.gami.com ([68.89.254.162] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c4)
  with ESMTP id 4031497 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:28:46 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.89.254.162; envelope-from=gwbraly@gami.com
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by sfa.gami.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEF8908
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:28:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: from gamimail1.Gami.local (mail.gami.com [10.10.10.33])
	by sfa.gami.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C637E7CC
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:28:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: from gamimail1.Gami.local ([10.10.12.14]) by gamimail1.Gami.local
 ([10.10.12.14]) with mapi; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:28:13 -0600
From: George Braly <gwbraly@gami.com>
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Original-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:28:11 -0600
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: io-550 vs. tsio-550 differences?
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: io-550 vs. tsio-550 differences?
Thread-Index: Acp/K1Beg4tuUZxvQGOAbfyZetxy2wB/p1aw
X-Original-Message-ID: <C273A1B35F3C6748B52EE0CC2FCEE96C0207B387589B@gamimail1.Gami.local>
References: <list-4025861@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4025861@logan.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_C273A1B35F3C6748B52EE0CC2FCEE96C0207B387589Bgamimail1Ga_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) (Debian) at gami.com