X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:36:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail3.dotsterhost.com ([72.5.54.189] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with SMTPS id 4027684 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:00:30 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=72.5.54.189; envelope-from=aviation@trepicone.com Received: (qmail 17943 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2009 15:59:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.6.6.174?) (aviation@trepicone.com@[166.205.10.223]) by 72.5.54.189 with SMTP; 18 Dec 2009 15:59:53 -0000 X-Original-Message-Id: <0DA3E0F6-FE6D-4045-A18E-0BED479E63C4@trepicone.com> From: Joe Trepicone X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-5--623050952 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (7D11) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 7D11) Subject: Re: [LML] Firewall X-Original-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:59:48 -0500 References: --Apple-Mail-5--623050952 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable One last thought about Brad's firewall experience. If the areas as he =20= discribes showed signs of exposure severe heat and quite possibly to =20 open flame that means the composite firewall was all the kept smoke =20 and fire from entering the cabin. How long does it take to burn =20 through e-glass or carbon? When similar produces are used in the =20 architecture and construction industry at fire rated asseblies =20 building codes and UL are very detailed as to how all penetrations are =20= done. Sleves with specific UL numbers must be submitted and approved =20= They usually require steel straping as well as fire caulking at =20 overlaps to avoid fire or smoke getting behind. And when a comustible =20= material is within 3" of a rated assembly the rated assebly must also =20= be rated "zero inches to combustible". Don't know if this is =20 applicable to aviation but - as Brads experirence suggests- maybe it =20 should be. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 18, 2009, at 10:18 AM, "Steve Colwell" =20 wrote: > > > Years ago Van=E2=80=99s tested several factory built RV=E2=80=99s for = smoke =20 > penetration of the firewall. I remember they were amazed how much s=20= > moke they got thru what they thought were pretty tight electrical, c=20= > able and misc. fittings in a ground simulation. They tightened up t=20= > he obvious holes and used High Temp Silicone and still had an unacce=20= > ptable volume of smoke coming in. > > > > Fire or even an oil leak might have smoke that could prevent =20 > breathing long enough or obscure vision or be enough of a =20 > distraction (pick one or more) to set up a fatal scenario. This =20 > could have been a factor in the Watsonville crash. > > > > Steve Colwell Legacy > > > > --Apple-Mail-5--623050952 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
One last thought about Brad's = firewall experience. If the areas as he discribes showed signs of = exposure severe heat and quite possibly to open flame that means the = composite firewall was all the kept smoke and fire from entering the = cabin.  How long does it take to burn through e-glass or carbon? =  When similar produces are used in the architecture and = construction industry at fire rated asseblies building codes and UL are = very detailed as to how all penetrations are done. Sleves with specific = UL numbers must be submitted and approved  They usually require = steel straping as well as fire caulking at overlaps to avoid fire or = smoke getting behind.  And when a comustible material is within 3" = of a rated assembly the rated assebly must also be rated "zero inches to = combustible". Don't know if this is applicable to aviation but - as = Brads experirence suggests- maybe it should be.   =   

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 18, 2009, = at 10:18 AM, "Steve Colwell" <mcmess1919@yahoo.com> = wrote:

 

Years ago Van=E2=80=99s tested several factory built = RV=E2=80=99s for smoke penetration of the firewall.  I remember they were amazed how much = smoke they got thru what they thought were pretty tight electrical, cable and misc. = fittings in a ground simulation.  They tightened up the obvious holes and = used High Temp Silicone and still had an unacceptable volume of smoke coming in.  =

 

Fire or even an oil leak might have smoke that could = prevent breathing long enough or obscure vision or be enough of a distraction = (pick one or more) to set up a fatal scenario.  This could have been a factor = in the Watsonville crash.

 

Steve Colwell  Legacy

 

 

= --Apple-Mail-5--623050952--