X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:21:20 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail15.tpgi.com.au ([203.12.160.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c3) with ESMTPS id 3999703 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:43:30 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=203.12.160.61; envelope-from=domcrain@tpg.com.au X-TPG-Junk-Status: Message not scanned X-TPG-Antivirus: Passed X-TPG-Abuse: host=60-241-193-89.static.tpgi.com.au; ip=60.241.193.89; date=Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:42:54 +1100 Received: from DomandJanPC (60-241-193-89.static.tpgi.com.au [60.241.193.89]) by mail15.tpgi.com.au (envelope-from domcrain@tpg.com.au) (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB2NgqTU003401 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:42:54 +1100 From: "Dominic V. Crain" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Vne is NOT a meaningless number X-Original-Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:42:52 +1100 X-Original-Message-ID: <004101ca73a9$2b53a610$81faf230$@com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0042_01CA7405.5EC41E10" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcpzXQLSvfWr7579TjmBalPOe6M39QASPjsw Content-Language: en-au This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01CA7405.5EC41E10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dom =E2=80=9Cold=E2=80=9D chap =20 Grayhawk, OLDER chap (heh heh), et al as well, =20 Just because I took another step into the future a week ago, no = =E2=80=93two weeks ago. =20 Seems to me that Vne definition is related to a visible connection to = the pilot =E2=80=93 i.e., the ASI. Having instant TAS read-out = hasn=E2=80=99t altered that and I didn=E2=80=99t mention that while = flogging along in the jet above FL260 plus the Vmo/Mmo represented by = the barbers pole reduces the Vmo but the Mmo remains the same. In the Lancair, which I refer to as the =E2=80=9Cpoor man=E2=80=99s = affordable jet=E2=80=9D, those of us who remain below 10,000 feet need = only refer to the Vne represented on the ASI. If you are in a higher = performing Lancair at altitude particularly the IVP and again the turbo, = then limiting Mach No. must be considered I should think. Yeah. Right. That=E2=80=99s it for now. Ciao Dom ------=_NextPart_000_0042_01CA7405.5EC41E10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dom =E2=80=9Cold=E2=80=9D chap

 

Grayhawk, OLDER chap (heh heh), et al as well,

 

Just because I took another step into the future a week ago, no =E2=80=93two = weeks ago.

 

Seems to me that Vne definition is related to a visible connection to the = pilot =E2=80=93 i.e., the ASI. Having instant TAS read-out hasn=E2=80=99t altered that and I = didn=E2=80=99t mention that while flogging along in the jet above FL260 plus the Vmo/Mmo = represented by the barbers pole reduces the Vmo but the Mmo remains the = same.

In the Lancair, which I refer to as the =E2=80=9Cpoor man=E2=80=99s = affordable jet=E2=80=9D, those of us who remain below 10,000 feet need only refer to the Vne represented on = the ASI. If you are in a higher performing Lancair at altitude particularly the = IVP and again the turbo, then limiting Mach No. must be considered I should = think.

Yeah.

Right.

That=E2=80=99s= it for now.

Ciao

Dom=

------=_NextPart_000_0042_01CA7405.5EC41E10--