X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:40:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3865664 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:18:49 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.63; envelope-from=rpharis@teamimc.com Received: from [71.116.122.253] (helo=s1) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MrBck-0003wr-EN for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:18:14 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <003701ca3deb$647f6580$2101a8c0@s1> Reply-To: "Rod Pharis" From: "Rod Pharis" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Pump vs. Scale for Epoxy mixing X-Original-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:20:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0034_01CA3DB0.B793DDE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1983 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1983 X-ELNK-Trace: 1293b74446918d85d780f4a490ca6956abb457f1b4332f52cc632bc85bd8e1bfb622511b3df9eb58350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.122.253 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01CA3DB0.B793DDE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My pump works perfectly. I check it against an electronic postal scale = every 6-months and it has always been right on the money. Rod ----- Original Message -----=20 From: WILLIAM HOLDEN=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 7:06 PM Subject: [LML] Pump vs. Scale for Epoxy mixing What are everyone's thoughts on using a pump versus a scale for epoxy = mixing? I have a pump that I bought used and can't seem to get it = working smoothly despite a lot of cleaning. Seems to me a scale and = cups are easier to keep clean and monitor rather than the pump? Any = thoughts? Will ------=_NextPart_000_0034_01CA3DB0.B793DDE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My pump works perfectly.  I check = it=20 against an electronic postal scale every 6-months and = it has=20 always been right on the money.
 
Rod
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 WILLIAM=20 HOLDEN
Sent: Thursday, September 24, = 2009 7:06=20 PM
Subject: [LML] Pump vs. Scale = for Epoxy=20 mixing

What are everyone's thoughts on using = a pump=20 versus a scale for epoxy mixing?  I have a pump that I bought = used and=20 can't seem to get it working smoothly despite a lot of cleaning.  = Seems=20 to me a scale and cups are easier to keep clean and monitor rather = than the=20 pump?  Any thoughts?
 
Will
------=_NextPart_000_0034_01CA3DB0.B793DDE0--