X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:58:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3690560 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:40:01 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.1; envelope-from=tom.gourley@verizon.net Received: from jacky0da39824a ([71.111.126.146]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KLM00CSRI9OXBX1@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:39:25 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Message-id: <48D083B3A768443A9CBF3520C19017D2@jacky0da39824a> Reply-to: "Tom Gourley" From: "Tom Gourley" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] interference? X-Original-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:39:18 -0700 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01C9F2B8.BB2D9240" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090621-0, 06/21/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C9F2B8.BB2D9240 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Terrence, I would keep the comm coax as far from the magnetometer as possible. In = addition make sure you're using quality coax, RG400 or better. Don't = use RG58. I would also use shielded wire to run power and gnd to the = magnetometer and ARHS. The nav coax shouldn't be a problem, it's only = function is to carry very small signals from the antenna, but if it's = running close to the comm coax I suppose the two could be coupling, in = which case having the nav coax close to the magnetometer might be an = issue. Tom Gourley ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C9F2B8.BB2D9240 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Terrence,
 
I would keep the comm coax as far from = the=20 magnetometer as possible.  In addition make sure you're using = quality coax,=20 RG400 or better.  Don't use RG58.  I would also use shielded = wire to=20 run power and gnd to the magnetometer and ARHS.  The nav coax = shouldn't be=20 a problem, it's only function is to carry very small signals from = the=20 antenna, but if it's running close to the comm coax I suppose the two = could be=20 coupling, in which case having the nav coax close to the = magnetometer might=20 be an issue.
 
Tom Gourley
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C9F2B8.BB2D9240--