X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:58:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from n66.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([98.136.44.50] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with SMTP id 3690733 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:26:43 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.136.44.50; envelope-from=casey.gary@yahoo.com Received: from [216.252.122.219] by n66.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2009 11:26:05 -0000 Received: from [68.142.237.88] by t4.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2009 11:26:05 -0000 Received: from [66.196.97.134] by t4.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2009 11:26:05 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp107.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jun 2009 11:26:05 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 532894.86753.bm@omp107.mail.re3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 27563 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jun 2009 11:26:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MeSHBx0fXNcXcXU3PVccqqUfPSKl2CFECi6vx9S1Gtj6rHtvmwrXzkr5s97iKDpnDsrih4qGrCDxn8flfCio53YEYD4WEEU+gQhPKr0TTgwItkhnsMZh6j3n7QB2r9fcD0pKMIiy78Hs6opEacjgDfKU13OeWMX2B3jJPIOoHoY=; X-Original-Message-ID: <83731.6717.qm@web57507.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: E7SqpEMVM1kr71YBhDjayWFS9DRI_3JQIAHQTdF_qAUSP99cnhvxXo5c019WXci_V0py1Xw.w2gG2ZVf9e1xX16ml9XKCt8bOu.OWgqKQ0VCPcFOZxWMVQGVkec.ZQiABh6Ave_P0HzYqce3DozMbHeamqNK5kp2OJqU8U3Fo0N_vG8mA6pg7RFYXEyNuBZvVV8vyjnTZ_sFbE509loPPN0g0aNZKCPJ78uBKKIX6wn84cKPRJuNbwuenXxYi7oNMqKbHfafkgTyTRgM4QNzr5xXGb7b2A_L_fENLp8KS6m6BkRw8X4HmupSkA-- Received: from [97.122.159.245] by web57507.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:26:03 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.43 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.15 References: X-Original-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:26:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Casey Subject: Re: Add another one to the List X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1700104822-1245669963=:6717" --0-1700104822-1245669963=:6717 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nice work, Brent.=A0 I've been in the pressure sensor business for quite a = while and I don't know of a commercially-available millivolt output sensor = that is environmentally packaged with a "real" connector; so your approach = may be the only option.=A0 In my opinion, a millivolt output sensor without= a fully sealed package, connector and wiring is unacceptable.=0A=0AJust an= other comment about loss of oil pressure:=A0 It's my understanding (please = correct me if I'm wrong!)=A0 that if the engine truly loses oil pressure th= e prop governor will also cease to function, creating an overspeed conditio= n.=A0 So a zero oil pressure indication without any change in engine speed = is cause for=A0concern and immediate landing, but not panic.=A0 On the othe= r hand, I have read a report of an accident where the engine speed started = to surge and the pilot assumed the governor was acting up.=A0 A minute late= r the oil pressure went to zero (oil leak caused loss of oil).=A0 Turns out= if he had recognized the surge as a loss of oil pressure he could have mad= e it to the nearby airport.=A0 So my "plan" is to go into panic mode if the= engine surges even though there is no oil pressure loss, but not panic if = the engine speed is stable but the oil pressure indication goes to zero.=A0= Both, of course require an immediate landing.=A0 The guy with the engine surge was flying a fully certified aircraft with NO oil pressure al= arm - how can "they" allow such things?=A0 I was tempted to install a low o= il pressure switch along with the electronic engine monitor, but I didn't.= =A0 Might be a good idea and I think I'll do it next time.=0A=0AGary Casey= =0A=0A=0A=0A=0AI had a similar experience as Bill=A0 except it was the oil = pressure sensor. Nothing gets you on the ground faster than a zero oil pres= sure alarm. Happened twice. The first time I replaced the sensor and the se= cond time was about a month later. I figured it must have been a connection= of the DPU so I replaced the cable, connections and even removed the DPU t= o verify proper function. I swapped fuel pressure and oil pressure inputs t= o be sure it wasn't a flaky A-D channel on the DPU.=A0 After weeks of mucki= ng about it turns out that the new sensor was flaky.=A0 A call to JP got th= e "You installed it you bought it" response. My reply? Foxtrot Yankee.=0A= =0AI never much cared for the Media Mate sensors because they used crummy "= Faston" spade connections that treat millivolt signals like a junk yard dog= so I decided to make something better.=0A=0AUnderstand that these types of= pressure sensors use strain gages (resistors that vary with strain) in a W= hetstone bridge configuration. The output is proportional to the input and = the pressure applied,=A0 or millivolts per volt of excitation per PSI of ap= plied pressure. If at 50 PSI and 5 volt excitation you get a 5 millivolt ou= tput then at 10 volt excitation you would get 10 millivolts at the same app= lied pressure. VM1000 uses 5 volt excitation.=0A=0AFor the oil pressure I e= nded up selecting the Honeywell 19C series in 0-100 PSI range (19C100PG4K) = http://sensing.honeywell.com/index.cfm?ci_id=3D140301&la_id=3D1&pr_id=3D145= 986=0A=0Aand machining a backshell out of aluminum to accept a MIL Spec 4 p= in connector. (see attached picture of the modeled assembly). You need acce= ss to a lathe and a mill for about an hour to make the backshell. The senso= r was about $110 and the connector another $20.=0A=0AThe fuel pressure sens= or needs to have a 0-50 PSI range so the part number would be 19C50PG4K.=0A= =0AThe sensor has been installed for over 2 years without any problem.=0A= =0AAny brave soul that wants to follow my footsteps to make their own backs= hell, email me and I'll send you a drawing, or better yet, the SolidWorks m= odel.=0A=0ARegards=0ABrent Regan=0A=0A=0A-----Inline Message Follows-----= =0A=0ASorry wrong picture. Here is the correct one. =0ABryan=0A=0A=0AOn Sat= , Jun 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Bryan Wullner wrote:=0A=0AMy = Lancair 360, N127EM, got its pink slip today after 4 years of construction.= Its now ready for test flights.=A0 =0AIts a Lancair 360 with MKII tail, ou= tback gear.=0ABryan=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-1700104822-1245669963=:6717 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Nice work, Brent.  I've been in the pressure sens= or business for quite a while and I don't know of a commercially-available = millivolt output sensor that is environmentally packaged with a "real" conn= ector; so your approach may be the only option.  In my opinion, a mill= ivolt output sensor without a fully sealed package, connector and wiring is= unacceptable.
=0A
 
=0A
Just another comment about = loss of oil pressure:  It's my understanding (please correct me if I'm= wrong!)  that if the engine truly loses oil pressure the prop governo= r will also cease to function, creating an overspeed condition.  So a = zero oil pressure indication without any change in engine speed is cause fo= r concern and immediate landing, but not panic.  On the other han= d, I have read a report of an accident where the engine speed started to su= rge and the pilot assumed the governor was acting up.  A minute later = the oil pressure went to zero (oil leak caused loss of oil).  Turns ou= t if he had recognized the surge as a loss of oil pressure he could have ma= de it to the nearby airport.  So my "plan" is to go into panic mode if= the engine surges even though there is no oil pressure loss, but not panic= if the engine speed is stable but the oil pressure indication goes to zero= ..  Both, of course require an immediate landing.  The guy with the engine surge was flying a fully = certified aircraft with NO oil pressure alarm - how can "they" allow such t= hings?  I was tempted to install a low oil pressure switch along with = the electronic engine monitor, but I didn't.  Might be a good idea and= I think I'll do it next time.
=0A
 
=0A
Gary Casey<= BR>
=0A

=0A

I had a similar experience as Bi= ll  except it was the oil pressure sensor. Nothing gets you on the gro= und faster than a zero oil pressure alarm. Happened twice. The first time I= replaced the sensor and the second time was about a month later. I figured= it must have been a connection of the DPU so I replaced the cable, connect= ions and even removed the DPU to verify proper function. I swapped fuel pre= ssure and oil pressure inputs to be sure it wasn't a flaky A-D channel on t= he DPU.  After weeks of mucking about it turns out that the new sensor= was flaky.  A call to JP got the "You installed it you bought it" res= ponse. My reply? Foxtrot Yankee.

I never much cared for the Media Ma= te sensors because they used crummy "Faston" spade connections that treat m= illivolt signals like a junk yard dog so I decided to make something better= ..

Understand that these types of pressure sensors use strain gages (resistors that vary with= strain) in a Whetstone bridge configuration. The output is proportional to= the input and the pressure applied,  or millivolts per volt of excita= tion per PSI of applied pressure. If at 50 PSI and 5 volt excitation you ge= t a 5 millivolt output then at 10 volt excitation you would get 10 millivol= ts at the same applied pressure. VM1000 uses 5 volt excitation.

For = the oil pressure I ended up selecting the Honeywell 19C series in 0-100 PSI= range (19C100PG4K) http://sensing.= honeywell.com/index.cfm?ci_id=3D140301&la_id=3D1&pr_id=3D145986=

and machining a backshell out of aluminum to accept a MIL Spec 4 pi= n connector. (see attached picture of the modeled assembly). You need acces= s to a lathe and a mill for about an hour to make the backshell. The sensor= was about $110 and the connector another $20.

The fuel pressure sensor = needs to have a 0-50 PSI range so the part number would be 19C50PG4K.
The sensor has been installed for over 2 years without any problem.
Any brave soul that wants to follow my footsteps to make their own backsh= ell, email me and I'll send you a drawing, or better yet, the SolidWorks mo= del.

Regards
Brent Regan


-----Inline Message Follows--= ---

Sorry wrong picture. Here is the correct one.=0A
Bryan
=0A
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Bryan Wullne= r <vonjet@gmail.com><= /SPAN> wrote:
=0A
My Lancair 360= , N127EM, got its pink slip today after 4 years of construction. Its now re= ady for test flights. =0A
Its a Lancair 360 with MKII tail, outbac= k gear.
=0A
Bryan


=0A=0A --0-1700104822-1245669963=:6717--