X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:56:03 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web33902.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.69.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with SMTP id 3638255 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 10 May 2009 23:38:06 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.191.69.180; envelope-from=wfhannahan@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32097 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2009 03:37:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GAQcHVP+KxBD6VFB9PW49asZkqgwHimJxyNHt4a/MKS2iCU7hW5X8XvYT5SY7azDHCs67erNQ5nqwu+umpxhYWiirWBS4E+p1r7peqmRKKXNDdrR3PhUQjn3o4pADOv0Z52mbWIWuDhynFLsawFnME+oFZIMY6mbhSrq3t4M4sU=; X-Original-Message-ID: <891779.31292.qm@web33902.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 1QehmQAVM1mU6hCo.CBGZ9AH4ZprIdQpypjlTORD1eRiuKAT6PQC9RUC Received: from [71.208.9.224] by web33902.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2009 20:37:32 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/5.2.20 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10 X-Original-Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 20:37:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Hannahan Subject: spinner against cowl X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1259078646-1242013052=:31292" --0-1259078646-1242013052=:31292 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0A=0A=0AI have dealt with this problem by shimming the lower mounts as = mentioned.=0AI also shortened the inner spacer, about 0.10 from memory, to = take up the slack=0Afrom the =E2=80=9Crelaxed=E2=80=9D rubber. =0A=0A=C2=A0= =0A=0AEventually the rubber gets hard and they need to be=0Areplaced.=0A=0A Regards, Bill Hannahan =20 wfhannahan@yahoo.com --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Keith Smith wrote: From: Keith Smith Subject: [LML] Re: spinner against cowl To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 3:55 PM Thanks for the replies.=C2=A0 I'll consider my options. The original owner wrote to me and suggested that it would be good to check= the clearance with the engine running to see if the clearance is better wh= en power is being produced, before making any changes.=20 =0A The plane has been flying without a problem for a while now, so I want to m= ake sure I'm not making something out of nothing. Keith =0A=0A=0A=0A --0-1259078646-1242013052=:31292 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
= =0A=0A

I have dealt with this problem by shimming the= lower mounts as mentioned.=0AI also shortened the inner spacer, about 0.10= from memory, to take up the slack=0Afrom the =E2=80=9Crelaxed=E2=80=9D rub= ber.

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A

Eventually the rubber gets hard and they need to be=0Areplac= ed.

=0A=0A

Regards,
Bill Hannahan

--- On Sun, 5/10/09, = Keith Smith <keith.smith@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Keith Smith <keith.smith@gmail.com>
Subject= : [LML] Re: spinner against cowl
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sund= ay, May 10, 2009, 3:55 PM

Thanks for the r= eplies.  I'll consider my options.

The original owner wrote to = me and suggested that it would be good to check the clearance with the engi= ne running to see if the clearance is better when power is being produced, = before making any changes.
=0A
The plane has been flying without a p= roblem for a while now, so I want to make sure I'm not making something out= of nothing.

Keith

=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-1259078646-1242013052=:31292--