X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:35:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com ([208.47.184.3] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTP id 3585463 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:59:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=208.47.184.3; envelope-from=liegner@embarqmail.com X-Original-Return-Path: X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=WS6Fo7hlG9gA:10 a=f5v8-CPDc-TRTgea_10A:9 a=emLxj2_23MekuMTWMY69rTsaaQsA:4 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.embarq.synacor.com smtp.user=liegner@embarqmail.com; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [71.1.169.55] ([71.1.169.55:10866] helo=[172.16.1.2]) by mailrelay.embarq.synacor.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.36 r(27513/27514)) with ESMTPA id D3/EB-09915-172B9E94; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:58:58 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: liegner@embarqmail.com@pop.embarqmail.com X-Original-Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:59:02 -0400 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" From: "Jeffrey Liegner, MD" Subject: Re: Landing distance for a IVP ? X-Original-Cc: John Hafen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Initially 3000' runway (until ~100 hrs), now 2750' (200+ hours). I've heard some have 2500' minimum, but not me. Jeff L LIVP (piston) >Gents: > >What do you guys use as far as personal minimums in runway length >when landing your IVıs? > >I know this is kind of a simplistic question and there are lots of >variables.  But lets say good weather, no head wind, sea level..... > You want to land and have a little margin for error in case you >float or donıt nail the first brick....What minimum runway would you >accept? > >John Hafen >IVP 413AJ 110 Hours