X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:22:58 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp-auth-01.mx.pitdc1.expedient.net ([206.210.66.134] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTPS id 3571478 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:08:11 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.210.66.134; envelope-from=rpastusek@htii.com Received: from HTBOB001 (unknown [65.202.210.118]) by smtp-auth-01.mx.pitdc1.expedient.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1501A84877 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:07:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert Pastusek" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Canopy closing system X-Original-Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 12:07:29 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <006301c9b6d1$c92e61d0$5b8b2570$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acm2rKEWWplPVew2RMu7GO62Pz3ABwAI0TNQ Content-Language: en-us Doug wrote: ... has anyone considered using an electric trunk closing system certified of course by cadillac or lincoln for the canopy? ... Doug, this is one area of construction that you'll want to consider carefully before abandoning the original design. There are a LOT of considerations that go into a canopy latch system, one being the ability to open it from the inside, or the outside when you're incapacitated/trapped inside. Weight, reliability, and many other things go into it as well. There are MANY opportunities to improve on the original design of almost everything with our airplanes, to include the canopy latch, but this is one area where simplicity, reliability and security are paramount. Unless you're improving one or all of these three, I'd recommend against changing... Just my two cents; no flames intended... Bob Pastusek