Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #50726
From: Art Bertolina <artbertolina@earthlink.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LOP vs ROP Climb: Time and Fuel Burn (LIVP)
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:32:47 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Re: [LML] LOP vs ROP Climb: Time and Fuel Burn (LIVP)
would like to hear what George or Walter could add to
this conversation. It was my understanding that higher RPM
is better for the engine, as long as the prop is not driving
engine
Art  
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: LOP vs ROP Climb: Time and Fuel Burn (LIVP)

Chuck said,
So, if you are going to reduce power, between MP or RPM, it is better to reduce MP since higher RPM keeps PP lower, at least that was their general conclusion, supported by engine shop experience.
 
I agree at high power settings for the reasons cited,  but once you get down to cruise power settings, if you are going to reduce power further, reducing rpm removes some friction component while reducing mp does not.  therefore you should get better mileage by lowering rpm.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster