X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:54:35 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [66.64.141.200] (HELO lucky.dts.local) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3529300 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:00:43 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.64.141.200; envelope-from=cjensen@dts9000.com Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C99DDE.678F12A0" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Swift Fuel reeks havoc on kitchen clearance X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:04:50 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <8984A39879F2F5418251CBEEC9C689B3E86901@lucky.dts.local> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Swift Fuel reeks havoc on kitchen clearance Thread-Index: AcmdxuHjwFXQcQ8QSaesgtFTgv2IBgAF3OTg From: "Chuck Jensen" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C99DDE.678F12A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John, =20 Not to worry....tell the wife she's welcome to come along. While the SF = is about a pound heavier per gallon, it also has 13% more stored heat = energy, so you don't need to carry as much fuel to go the same distance. = Funny how that works; heavier fuels hold more BTUs....must just be a = coincidence. =20 Chuck Jensen=20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of = John Hafen Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:12 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Swift Fuel reeks havoc on kitchen clearance If the Swift Fuel is, as they say: "about a pound heavier per gallon," that makes it pretty much a non-starter in my IVP. "Sorry Honey, you = have to stay home on this trip. I just loaded up on "Swift Fuel." If a guy leaves his wife home, because he's now a hundred pounds = heavier, and he had to choose between taking his wife along or his golf = clubs, then the resulting scenario hurls a javelin through the heart of = the primary core of aerodynamics of flight - you know - what makes an = airplane fly, which is "kitchen clearance." (we all know it has nothing = to do with lift and drag and all that stuff) On 3/4/09 10:34 AM, "Kevin Stallard" wrote: Looks like the FAA testing labs are coming out with some positive = feedback on Swift Fuel (100LL replacement). Looking good! =20 http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/bizav/1325-full.html#199892 =20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C99DDE.678F12A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: [LML] Swift Fuel reeks havoc on kitchen clearance
John,
 
Not to=20 worry....tell the wife she's welcome to come along.  While the SF = is about=20 a pound heavier per gallon, it also has 13% more stored heat energy, so = you=20 don't need to carry as much fuel to go the same distance.  Funny = how that=20 works; heavier fuels hold more BTUs....must just be a=20 coincidence.
 
Chuck = Jensen=20

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing = List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of John = Hafen
Sent:=20 Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:12 PM
To:=20 lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Swift Fuel reeks = havoc on=20 kitchen clearance

If the=20 Swift Fuel is, as they say:

“about a=20 pound heavier per gallon,”

that makes it pretty much a non-starter = in my IVP.=20  “Sorry Honey, you have to stay home on this trip.  I = just loaded up=20 on “Swift Fuel.”

If a guy leaves his wife home, = because he’s now a=20 hundred pounds heavier, and he had to choose between taking his wife = along or=20 his golf clubs, then the resulting scenario hurls a javelin through = the heart=20 of the primary core of  aerodynamics of flight — you know = — what makes an=20 airplane fly, which is “kitchen clearance.”  (we all = know it has nothing=20 to do with lift and drag and all that stuff)


On 3/4/09 = 10:34 AM,=20 "Kevin Stallard" <Kevin@arilabs.net>=20 wrote:

Looks like the FAA testing labs are coming = out with=20 some positive feedback on Swift Fuel (100LL replacement). =  Looking=20 good!
 
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/bizav/1325-full.html#199892 
 


------_=_NextPart_001_01C99DDE.678F12A0--