X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:11:40 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from QMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.40] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3527819 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:49:46 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.30.40; envelope-from=j.hafen@comcast.net Received: from OMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by QMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id P0Gz1b0010S2fkCA4DpA8b; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:49:10 +0000 Received: from [10.128.90.198] ([75.151.125.133]) by OMTA09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PDp91b0072soXEK8VDp9l5; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 01:49:10 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119 X-Original-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:49:07 -0800 Subject: Re: [LML] Swift Fuel reeks havoc on kitchen clearance From: John Hafen X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [LML] Swift Fuel reeks havoc on kitchen clearance Thread-Index: AcmdNJH+MDH7GFa1NEeN0orf2gYt8A== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3319033749_827366" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3319033749_827366 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable If the Swift Fuel is, as they say: =B3about a pound heavier per gallon,=B2 that makes it pretty much a non-starter in my IVP. =B3Sorry Honey, you have to stay home on this trip. I just loaded up on =B3Swift Fuel.=B2 If a guy leaves his wife home, because he=B9s now a hundred pounds heavier, and he had to choose between taking his wife along or his golf clubs, then the resulting scenario hurls a javelin through the heart of the primary cor= e of aerodynamics of flight =8B you know =8B what makes an airplane fly, which i= s =B3kitchen clearance.=B2 (we all know it has nothing to do with lift and drag and all that stuff) On 3/4/09 10:34 AM, "Kevin Stallard" wrote: > Looks like the FAA testing labs are coming out with some positive feedbac= k on > Swift Fuel (100LL replacement). Looking good! > =20 > http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/bizav/1325-full.html#199892 > =20 > =20 > =20 >=20 --B_3319033749_827366 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [LML] Swift Fuel reeks havoc on kitchen clearance If the Swift Fuel is, as they say:

“about a pound heavier per gallon,”=

that makes it pretty much a non-starter in my IVP.  “Sorry Honey= , you have to stay home on this trip.  I just loaded up on “Swift= Fuel.”

If a guy leaves his wife home, because he’s now a hundred pounds heav= ier, and he had to choose between taking his wife along or his golf clubs, t= hen the resulting scenario hurls a javelin through the heart of the primary = core of  aerodynamics of flight — you know — what makes an = airplane fly, which is “kitchen clearance.”  (we all know i= t has nothing to do with lift and drag and all that stuff)


On 3/4/09 10:34 AM, "Kevin Stallard" <Kevin@arilabs.net> wrote:

Looks like the FAA testing labs are coming out with some posit= ive feedback on Swift Fuel (100LL replacement).  Looking good!
 
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archives/bizav/1325-full.html#199892
 
 

--B_3319033749_827366--