X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:15:05 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [69.146.254.20] (HELO arilabs.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3527680 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:13:21 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.146.254.20; envelope-from=Kevin@arilabs.net Subject: RE: [LML] Re: TruTrak autopliot and RF MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-Original-Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:12:42 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Message-ID: <7141427652BB3049A7DBF1084B67805B1E3016@penumbra.arilabs.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: TruTrak autopliot and RF Thread-Index: Acmc99WxSreXGfhwQciJlKjgOJdK6gALxL1w From: "Kevin Stallard" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" My question is, if you have to create a path for HF signals to return to their sources (i.e. the 50 pf caps), how are they getting superimposed on those lines in the first place? I wonder if it is radiated noise or conducted? Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of John Schroeder Sent: 2009-03-04 11:34 To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: TruTrak autopliot and RF Chris - We used the same items as did Steve. They come in various capacitance and =20 according to the chart on the Amphenol website, 50 pico farads would =20 capture the com band frequencies. The principle is that each pin has a =20 capacitor between the top of the pin (input) and ground (case) to shunt rf energy to ground. We put one on between the connector and the tray and =20 also on each of the servos. Our com antenna #2 was in the starboard wall of the baggage compartment (ES) and it also had an effect on the EFIS. We =20 went to an external com antenna on the belly as #1 and made the one in the =20 vertical stab #2. We also put baluns on each of the power cables (fat =20 wires) where they interfaced to the panel and then on the feeder cables to =20 the busses. This solved most all of the RF problems - except for the Ray Allen trim indicators. They still dim when we transmit. We also performed =20 the installation test for RF prescribed in the Garmin GNS 480 Installation =20 Manual. We had no RF interference with the GPS. Allied Electronics/Electric also has a product similar to the Amphenols. I =20 ordered one to try in case the Amphenols didn't work. So, I don't know its =20 effectiveness. Hope this helps. John On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:13:24 -0500, Steve Richard =20 wrote: > I used this and it helped: =20 > http://www.vonero.com/index.php?/showproduct/853439 > > Steve Richard > > Chris Zavatson wrote: > A recent upgrade to more powerful com radios has introduced a bit of an =20 > undesirable problem with the Trutrak autopilot. When the auto pilot is =20 > engaged and the #2 radio is keyed, serious pitch oscillations occur. -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html