X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:44:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.70] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3515576 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:23:25 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.70; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=OLXYKcrwBa4bQHpJiBZT3QTzppjq9L9/0NU0tzi2J/Qk2qQateIfUVSeBdlF7Oaf; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.63] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LcNT8-0004oZ-Es for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:22:50 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <019701c9976d$ae627f90$0c8d020a@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IVP hstab incidence (was 360 in a small-tail LNC2) X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:22:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0194_01C99743.C464E780" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da9405f134aff43bc8b04573836567a667a2a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.63 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0194_01C99743.C464E780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've had 3 responses on this so far and they are consistent: Everyone has horn showing above the hstab in cruise at mid CG's, and I'm = inferring here, everyone has plenty of up trim left at to and landing = configs. Doesn't that say the factory recommendation on hstab incidence is too = negative? ------=_NextPart_000_0194_01C99743.C464E780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've had 3 responses on this so far and = they are=20 consistent:
Everyone has horn showing above the = hstab in=20 cruise at mid CG's, and I'm inferring here, everyone has plenty of up = trim left=20 at to and landing configs.
Doesn't that say the factory = recommendation on=20 hstab incidence is too negative?
------=_NextPart_000_0194_01C99743.C464E780--