X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:44:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3515581 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:40:29 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=Fxg/CMUX4VEkUUmKhTMciEQz+L3M1cJ/f72NNAdW9+iTz5JW4LjdsVuX1CPuOGPe; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.63] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LcNje-0006eC-0A for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:39:54 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <01c601c99770$106510c0$0c8d020a@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Are you WAAS ready? X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:39:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01C3_01C99746.27098510" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940eaf020868a4c79829e38c4f1c45908f9350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.63 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01C3_01C99746.27098510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chuck, that's a good point. I'll vote for the high time current/no waas guy, all things being equal. but things are not equal. WAAS gets you a glideslope, so even if you fly to higher minimums, there = are less opportunities to screw up on the intermediate step down = altitudes. WAAS on Garmin also gets you a a/p coupled approach where there once was = none. Colyn ------=_NextPart_000_01C3_01C99746.27098510 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chuck, that's a good = point.
I'll vote for the high time current/no = waas guy,=20 all things being equal.
but things are not equal.
WAAS gets you a glideslope, so even if = you fly to=20 higher minimums, there are less opportunities to screw up on the = intermediate=20 step down altitudes.
WAAS on Garmin also gets you a a/p = coupled approach=20 where there once was none.
 
Colyn
 
------=_NextPart_000_01C3_01C99746.27098510--