X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:16:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.210] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3511987 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:57 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imr-m08.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v39.1.) id q.c9f.4760003d (37568) for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-mb01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-mb01.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.148]) by cia-mb04.mx.aol.com (v123.3) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMB045-5c6149a2e0c7338; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:55 -0500 Received: from WEBMAIL-MC04 (webmail-mc04.webmail.aol.com [64.12.170.81]) by smtprly-mb01.mx.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMB017-5c6149a2e0c7338; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:43 -0500 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Nomenclature X-Original-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:43 -0500 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 72.19.171.41 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CB63F5AF515A2C_9E0_D67_WEBMAIL-MC04.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 41421-STANDARD Received: from 72.19.171.41 by WEBMAIL-MC04.sysops.aol.com (64.12.170.81) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:45:43 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CB63F5AF4EF7D4-9E0-6B0@WEBMAIL-MC04.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO ----------MB_8CB63F5AF515A2C_9E0_D67_WEBMAIL-MC04.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sometimes using the wrong word is unimportant.? Sometimes it's deadly.? I have seen several postings in the last few days where the wrong word was used, and the message may be misinterpreted. 1)? Elevator bob weight -- In a 320 / 360, this is just aft of the baggage bulkhead.? It is connected to the idler in th pushrod linkage.? Its purpose is to increase the stick force per G.? It is not visible in flight. 2? Elevator counterweight -- This is mounted in the portion of the elevator which is forward of the hinge line.? It is not visible in flight either, but the front part of the elevator is visible. Confusing the names of the above will not hurt you. 1)? BID -- a ply of bidirectional cloth.? I think this nickname came into vogue with the Vari-Eze, but I don't really know. 2)? One ply of uni -- a ply of unidirectional cloth Confusing these two *can* kill you.? I have read recent postings where people are referring to plies of UNI as "BIDs".? Use bidirectional cloth where you are supposed to use unidirectional and your part will only be?50% strength in the direction that matters.? PLEASE don't say "BID" when you mean "plies of UNI".? Someone might misunderstand you and build an airplane that is not strong enough.? (Although I don't think that using BID on a canopy instead of UNI will actually cause a strctural failure.) Picky?? Anal?? Guilty as charged. - Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CB63F5AF515A2C_9E0_D67_WEBMAIL-MC04.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Sometimes using the wrong word is unimportant.  Sometimes it's deadly.  I have seen several postings in the last few days where the wrong word was used, and the message may be misinterpreted.

1)  Elevator bob weight -- In a 320 / 360, this is just aft of the baggage bulkhead.  It is connected to the idler in th pushrod linkage.  Its purpose is to increase the stick force per G.  It is not visible in flight.

2  Elevator counterweight -- This is mounted in the portion of the elevator which is forward of the hinge line.  It is not visible in flight either, but the front part of the elevator is visible.

Confusing the names of the above will not hurt you.

1)  BID -- a ply of bidirectional cloth.  I think this nickname came into vogue with the Vari-Eze, but I don't really know.

2)  One ply of uni -- a ply of unidirectional cloth

Confusing these two *can* kill you.  I have read recent postings where people are referring to plies of UNI as "BIDs".  Use bidirectional cloth where you are supposed to use unidirectional and your part will only be 50% strength in the direction that matters.  PLEASE don't say "BID" when you mean "plies of UNI".  Someone might misunderstand you and build an airplane that is not strong enough.  (Although I don't think that using BID on a canopy instead of UNI will actually cause a strctural failure.)

Picky?  Anal?  Guilty as charged.

- Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CB63F5AF515A2C_9E0_D67_WEBMAIL-MC04.sysops.aol.com--