X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:51:00 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from QMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.24] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3501885 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:12:36 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.24; envelope-from=mjrav@comcast.net Received: from OMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.43]) by QMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id J0qY1b00F0vyq2s523C0Q9; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:12:01 +0000 Received: from mjr ([75.69.204.139]) by OMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id J3Bu1b00U30yRb73R3Bxr7; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:11:57 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <026e01c99309$27af5300$8bcc454b@mjr> From: "Mark Ravinski" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] 360 in a small-tail LNC2? X-Original-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:13:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_026B_01C992DF.3EAB5D30" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1933 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1933 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_026B_01C992DF.3EAB5D30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul, If I remember right, there is only about 40 lbs. more engine with the = 360. That's not enough to make a lot of difference to handling. (2.2% of = gross weight - or like having 7 more gal of fuel on board) Having the 20 extra horses does add some to climb and runway = performance. (20 / 160 =3D 13% power increase) If you have more specific questions, let me know. =20 Mark Ravinski 360 small tail 1458 hrs 1088 of it mine over 12 years of flying. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: marv@lancair.net=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 8:14 PM Subject: [LML] 360 in a small-tail LNC2? Posted for PAUL HERSHORIN : My son has a 320 with a small tail and he asked me to ask if there is=20 any one out there that has put a 360 in a Lancair with a small = tail--if they=20 have what are the problems and how does it handle. Paul Hershorin 360 471LA -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_026B_01C992DF.3EAB5D30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Paul,
If I remember right, there is only = about 40 lbs.=20 more engine with the 360.
That's not enough to make a lot of = difference to=20 handling.  (2.2% of gross weight - or like having 7 more gal of = fuel on=20 board)
Having the 20 extra horses does add = some to climb=20 and runway performance.
(20 / 160  =3D 13% power = increase)
 
If you have more specific questions, = let me=20 know. 
 
Mark Ravinski
360 small tail   1458 = hrs  1088 of=20 it mine over 12 years of flying.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 marv@lancair.net=20
Sent: Thursday, February 19, = 2009 8:14=20 PM
Subject: [LML] 360 in a = small-tail=20 LNC2?


Posted for PAUL = HERSHORIN=20 <paulhershorin@bellsouth.net>:

My=20 son has a 320 with a small tail and he asked me to ask if there is =
any one=20 out there that has put a 360 in a Lancair with a small tail--if they =
have=20 what are the problems and how does it handle.
 Paul=20 Hershorin
 360  471LA

--

For archives and unsub http://mail=
.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
------=_NextPart_000_026B_01C992DF.3EAB5D30--