X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:28:24 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-3490040@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <r.simon@ustek.com>
Received: from [70.62.14.124] (HELO server1.USTEK)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12)
  with ESMTP id 3489503 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:24:47 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=r.simon@ustek.com
Subject: RE: O-320 engine, too lean
X-Original-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:28:33 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Original-Message-ID: <BFF2A5CF4A51DD4A8FCF25A203C274517DE430@server1.USTEK>
In-Reply-To: <web-3488150@logan.com>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: O-320 engine, too lean
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Thread-Index: AcmNDWvADgGAKMirR3GI8oGjbnQYlg==
From: "Lancair" <lancair-esp@ustek.com>
X-Original-Sender: "Robert Simon" <r.simon@ustek.com>
X-Original-To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

  <snip>  I run my IO 320 either at about 110F ROP or about 50F LOP,
depending on  whether I wish to go fast or not. I don't see any reason
to run the engine outside the Manufacturer  representation for best
power or best economy and in agreement with GAMI  recommendations.
<snip>=20
=20
I run my TSIO550 full rich on climb and then lean back to get the TIT
less than 1600F ( 870C).  That is often 150F (85C) degrees LoP EGT. =20

Robert M. Simon
ES-P N301ES