X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:46:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.12) with ESMTP id 3452732 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:58:45 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.122; envelope-from=tednoel@cfl.rr.com Received: from OfficeDesktop ([68.204.83.75]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20090126125807.PWE16090.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@OfficeDesktop> for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:58:07 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <37A0394925BC450B922F67C030AE3160@OfficeDesktop> From: "Ted Noel" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel Tank Testing X-Original-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:58:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 Bob, I'm glad you mentioned the vacuum cleaner in the end of your post. I tested my tanks with a ShopVac. After sealing carefully all openings (reversibly!), I attached a ShopVac. It pulled about 3" of negative pressure. I measured this with a fuel system pressure gauge. Having pulled this relative vacuum, I used a ball shut-off valve from an air tool system to seal the system and shut off the ShopVac. 24 hours later, I still had 3" of vacuum. Ted Noel N540TF ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Pastusek" To: Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 7:42 AM Subject: [LML] Re: Fuel Tank Testing > Bryan wrote: > > I am in the middle of testing my fuel tanks for leaks with a vacuum > pump. How long is long enough to hold vacuum to prove it wont leak? > > > Be very careful with the vacuum pump. More than one Lancair builder has > "imploded" his wing tanks with this not-so tried and true method. There > have > also been several mishaps from people trying to use compressed air to test > for leaks. This method is almost certain to provide comic relief to > others...don't even consider it. You might, however, consider an > alternative > method that worked well for me: > > Carefully seal all openings/vents, etc except one--the fuel pickup port, > or > the return line work well because you can provide it with a very air-tight > fitting to your "test rig." Make a test rig from a good-quality latex > balloon--the kind used for filling with helium are generally OK--and a > short > piece of aluminum pipe with a fitting that will attach to your fuel tank > opening. CAREFULLY seal the balloon to the pipe. RTV on the pipe, and a > rubber band wrapped over the neck of the balloon to hold it tightly to the > pipe works well. Blow up the balloon and twist the neck to keep the air > inside while you attach the fitting end to your tank. When you allow the > balloon to un-twist, most of the air will rush into the tank until the > (very > small) pressure is equalized, but the balloon needs to remain partially > inflated. You may need a couple of tries to get it right... You have a > fuel-tight tank when the size of the balloon changes with the barometric > pressure over 2-3 days, but does not go flat during that time. > > You can make a fancy test rig with a Tee and valve, etc, to aid in filling > the balloon, but everything you add must be absolutely air tight or you're > adding complications with negative benefit. I can't over-emphasize the > need > for careful sealing of all openings/fittings. For example, I used clear > packaging (release) tape to seal the filler cap opening on my tanks. Since > the cap was larger than the width of my tape, I used two strips, carefully > overlapped and pressed down. My balloon went flat in about two days. > Double > checked every joint/connection and opening with soapy water and concluded > I > had a leak in the tank, but before proceeding with "dunking the wing" to > find it, I tested the second wing tank. Same results...a very slow leak > that > deflated the balloon in a couple of days. I then went back with the soapy > water around the openings and discovered air leaking along the inside edge > of the clear packaging tape where I'd overlapped them across the top of > the > filler cap. One very small bubble every half minute or so at each end of > the > tape where one strip laid across the other! YGBSM! Anyway, it was enough > of > a leak to deflate the balloon--in time. Re-applied the tape strips with a > very small wipe of RTV at the edge of the first tape and both tanks tested > well. The balloon stayed inflated for a week or so for each tank. > > Bottom line: This method works well, and is safe to use. The tanks can > stand > VERY LITTLE positive or negative pressure, so no matter what method you > use, > be very careful, and don't even think about approaching your tanks with a > compressed air hose...or even a vacuum cleaner hose for that matter! > > Bob Pastusek > > > > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.12/1911 - Release Date: 1/23/2009 7:28 AM