X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:00:28 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.143.99] (HELO imo-m11.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTP id 3316251 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:21:51 -0500 Received: from TByrnes133@aol.com by imo-m11.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v39.1.) id q.bcb.3dfcbc34 (29679) for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:21:46 -0500 (EST) From: TByrnes133@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:21:46 EST Subject: Re: [LML] 360 Fuel Vent X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1227615706" X-Mailer: AOL 9.1 sub 5001 X-Spam-Flag:NO -------------------------------1227615706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eric That's what I had in my Lancair 235/290 with no header tank and that's what is in my Lancair IV. I understand that they recommend 3/8 vent line on the Lancair IV, now but we have not had a problem in flowing 43 Gals per hour on takeoff with the 1/4 inch line. Tom Byrnes Lancair IV N54TB In a message dated 11/24/2008 11:01:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, cassutt@windstream.net writes: I am not using the header tank in my 360 and have installed 1/4" od tubing as the vent for each wing tank. My old SB manual says nothing about fuel vent size even with the header and what published updates there are for the extended bay don't have a size listed either. Is this big enough dia. for pulling fuel straight from the wings or should it be larger? What have others done. Eric Demaray 360 SB -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html **************One site has it all. Your email accounts, your social networks, and the things you love. Try the new AOL.com today!(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1212962939x1200825291/aol?redir=http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp %26icid=aolcom40vanity%26ncid=emlcntaolcom00000001) -------------------------------1227615706 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Eric

That's what I had in my Lancair 235/290 with no header tank and that's=20= what=20 is in my Lancair IV. I understand that they recommend 3/8 vent line on= the=20 Lancair IV, now but we have not had a problem in flowing 43 Gals per h= our=20 on takeoff with the 1/4 inch line.

Tom Byrnes Lancair IV N54TB

In a message dated 11/24/2008 11:01:34 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,=20 cassutt@windstream.net writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>I am not=20 using the header tank in my 360 and have installed 1/4" od tubing as the v= ent=20 for each wing tank. My old SB manual says nothing about fuel vent size eve= n=20 with the header and what published updates there are for the extended bay=20 don't have a size listed either. Is this big enough dia. for pulling= =20 fuel straight from the wings or should it be larger? What have others=20 done.

Eric Demaray
360 SB

--
For archives and unsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

One site has it all. Your em= ail accounts, your social networks, and the things you love. Try the new=20= AOL.com today!

-------------------------------1227615706--