Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #49480
From: Jim Scales <joscales98@hotmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LML
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:01:16 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
I have been a participant of the LML for a long time.  Marv has done a great job of enhancing the Lancair experience for a lot of people.  I have been flying my ES for about 9 years now and have utilized many ideas and trouble shot many issues that were discussed on the list.
 
I sometimes think the list is incorporating some really strange subjects but, when really looking at the postings, I realize that by far the majority of things that are on the list pertain to building, maintaining, repairing, modifying, inspecting, insuring, training and flying Lancairs.  I don’t have a problem with the variety of subjects.
 
I tend to learn something from everyone regardless of their perspective or the subject.  I would not recommend filtering the input any more than is now being done.
 
If there are those who don’t ask questions and expect their un-asked questions to be covered somewhere in the daily discussions then they are going to be waiting for a long time.  If someone asks a question and doesn’t get a reply in a reasonable time then that person should realize that not all listers are present all the time.  Just ask the question again.  Eventually someone will provide some input.  I have had to post the same question multiple times in the past before getting feedback.  Requires a little patience sometimes.  No biggie.
 
The list has been a big help to me and continues to be a place I enjoy.  Keep the discussions coming.  Like Earl says, my delete button works very well and I don’t have to read things that don’t interest me.
 
I will air my one pet peeve regarding the list before I close.  It is frustrating when someone posts and changes the subject of the thread without changing the subject line for the posting.  When this happens the thread changes direction and can become entirely different from the subject that is listed in the title.  Fine to change direction but give the ones who are expecting the content to match the subject title some consideration.
 
Have fun,
 
Jim Scales
 
(Earl, how close would you consider other Lancair owners have to be for you to consider them "close" to you?)
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 9:06 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: LML

Bryan, Angier, Marv,
I doubt if many are actually building kits today.  Having purchased my kit in 1987 and flying today, I still read each post and learn from time to time.  I know of no Lancair builders within several hundred miles and I am the only owner in this area also.  There are several RV kits in progress and several flying.

I would be interested in how often a reply it sent to a builder privately.  I know I send most privately to avoid the wrath of some here on LML.  As age increases, my skin thins...

Marv, I really don't mind seeing the many discussion paths.  My delete key works for me.  I do appreciate you for taking the time to support this forum!  Earl


From: Bryan Wullner <vonjet@gmail.com>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 6:36:20 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: LML

Angier,

I agree.  It seems like there isn't much happening on the LML as far build discussions.  You can still get answers to some but really seems like not much activity for, what I thought to be a fairly large amount of aircraft kits out there. 
Anyone know how many Lancair kits have been sold since the inception? 
Lancair builders and owners are either: 
1. Going extinct or: 
2. People who fly and build Lancairs don't care to have any web presence. Which will eventually lead Lancair to item 1 in this age..
Soon its going to be a world where experiment airplane is defined as an RV.
Thats my Wahhh wahhh wahh viewpoint of the day.
Bryan
  



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:08 PM, <marv@lancair.net> wrote:
Posted for "Greenbacks, UnLtd." <N4ZQ@comcast.net>:

 I may be confused about the original purpose and intent of LML but  then
again, I'm confused by many things of late.
 As I recall, LML came into existence in order to be a sort of  clearinghouse
for builders to share building tips, techniques, problem  solving, etc... and
as an extension/supplement to factory technical  support.
 
 LML seems to me to be drifting wide of this mark and in danger of  losing its
relevance, to me anyway. Perhaps I'm one of only a few  still building and as
such, recent posts about FAA crud are of little  importance to me.
 
 Angier Ames
 N4ZQ
 N3ZQ


[Good points, Angier.... I've always tried to keep a very light hand on the LML, allowing the community to pretty much police itself.  As a more-or-less open venue, its focus tends to shift with the times.  It was a much different community back when I started the LML, one that was pretty much dominated by builders.  Over the years much of that building has resulted in completed aircraft and a change of focus for those folks who have moved from building to flying and maintaining.  This doesn't mean that we still don't have meaningful discussions about the former, just that they tend to be fewer and further between.  That being said, if you (and I mean that collectively here) would prefer that I start filtering the more "peripheral" discussions from the LML, I'd be happy to do so.  My concern is mostly about where to draw the line.  Let me think about it over the weekend, and if anyone else would like to chime in with suggestions or solutions to perceived problems, please feel free to contact me offline at my private email address, just so we don't clog the LML with a bunch of management issues that are better left in the back room.  Thanks to everyone for your continued support and participation... without you the LML would be an empty email box.  <Marv>   ]

--

For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html


Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster