X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:06:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with ESMTP id 3301516 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:42:27 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.123; envelope-from=super_chipmunk@roadrunner.com Received: from Laptop ([74.75.176.139]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20081115144149.ERKZ5347.cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com@Laptop> for ; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:41:49 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: From: "Bill Wade" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LML X-Original-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:41:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003F_01C94706.64B725B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C94706.64B725B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm a bit reluctant to suggest building tips- there seem to be a lot of p= eople on the list with very impressive credentials. The things I come up wi= th seem pretty simple-minded and basic at times. They may be valuable to so= me but who knows? I figure we all bring different experiences to the group = so the way I may look at things will be different than others, for better o= r worse. My knowledge comes from working on a limited number of planes, not= classroom study. As a result my knowledge is spotty but I'm pretty good at= figuring things out. I'd like to feel I can make suggestions or even wild = ass guesses (if they're identified as such) without being considered an idi= ot. That's a part of learning. This group seems to discourage speculation t= hough. Am I wrong? OTOH when I ask a technical question on building I get silence as often as= not. Is that due to lack of expertise in the group (I doubt it) or not wan= ting to give advice that might cause problems later? That's my whine and I'm sticking to it. -Bill Wade ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Bryan Wullner=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 7:36 AM Subject: [LML] Re: LML Angier, I agree. It seems like there isn't much happening on the LML as far buil= d discussions. You can still get answers to some but really seems like not= much activity for, what I thought to be a fairly large amount of aircraft = kits out there.=20 Anyone know how many Lancair kits have been sold since the inception?=20 Lancair builders and owners are either:=20 1. Going extinct or:=20 2. People who fly and build Lancairs don't care to have any web presence.= Which will eventually lead Lancair to item 1 in this age.. Soon its going to be a world where experiment airplane is defined as an R= V. Thats my Wahhh wahhh wahh viewpoint of the day. Bryan =20 ------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C94706.64B725B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
  I'm a bit reluctant to suggest buil= ding=20 tips- there seem to be a lot of people on the list with very impressive=20 credentials. The things I come up with seem pretty simple-minded and basic = at=20 times. They may be valuable to some but who knows? I figure we all bring=20 different experiences to the group so the way I may look at things will be= =20 different than others, for better or worse. My knowledge comes from wo= rking=20 on a limited number of planes, not classroom study. As a result my knowledg= e is=20 spotty but I'm pretty good at figuring things out. I'd like to feel I can m= ake=20 suggestions or even wild ass guesses (if they're identified as=20 such) without being considered an idiot. That's a part of learning. Th= is=20 group seems to discourage speculation though. Am I wrong?
 
 OTOH when I ask a technical question= on=20 building I get silence as often as not. Is that due to lack of experti= se in=20 the group (I doubt it) or not wanting to give advice that might cause probl= ems=20 later?
 
  That's my whine and I'm sticking to= =20 it.  -Bill Wade
----- Original Message -----
Fro= m:=20 Bryan Wullne= r=20
Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 = 7:36=20 AM
Subject: [LML] Re: LML

Angier,

I agree.  It seems like there isn't much happening on the LML a= s far=20 build discussions.  You can still get answers to some but really see= ms=20 like not much activity for, what I thought to be a fairly large amount of= =20 aircraft kits out there. 
Anyone know how many Lancair kits have been sold since the=20 inception? 
Lancair builders and owners are either: 
1. Going extinct or: 
2. People who fly and build Lancairs don't care to have any web pres= ence.=20 Which will eventually lead Lancair to item 1 in this age..
Soon its going to be a world where experiment airplane is defined as= an=20 RV.
Thats my Wahhh wahhh wahh viewpoint of the day.
Bryan
  


 
------=_NextPart_000_003F_01C94706.64B725B0--