X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:39:26 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web65401.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.9.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with SMTP id 3283417 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 21:00:08 -0500 Received: (qmail 49086 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Nov 2008 02:00:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=YAsKX1pVgwis86jLjFMVRm8dpe6wXFZTstHt+gdp4U2QKDL6h9tR8Q3K2rHMCuwCVtoR810TODBjE7g4RCrwYqW/yNguICMVoXGaKv5883w9m9jyqULKCaTKa3KBxhApJNnhgvn79Uw0Cgjdq2AUyYvXtrx+1Zfn3rE6T+b5YCM=; X-YMail-OSG: aai4Y_sVM1lFPMCg1cAqtXxdBzR2b4Adq5IucRq8hGZX_j.naJ.7lx0Am7aaFXWVJ_TPbSyCWNSpN.XtfwxkT83JSJENQh91CpbhA22jPzbVSIPxy9hKTEuWM2AYVQTLAmC7AY85CYdsyAB4_Zjz6BxotlLtFaVXtAXThbLzPteCMMxtej8DDjcSMPc- Received: from [24.39.231.241] by web65401.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:00:08 PST X-Original-Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:00:08 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Reeves Subject: Re: [LML] Comment Period Extension X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1712240456-1226282408=:48436" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Original-Message-ID: <352543.48436.qm@web65401.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> --0-1712240456-1226282408=:48436 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Joe, Can you link us to the exact document you are referring to that you want us to comment on? I went to EAA's site and the instructions to comment are vague. Thanks. Matt Joe Bartels wrote: For those of you who have not commented on the proposed FAA "Major Portion" rule changes, seems as though the FAA forgot something or another and now has provided us with a further extension within which to comment. There are a lot of you who have not commented on these onerous changes and I ask that you take the time to do so now! The sum and substance of the FAA's proposed policy change is that commercial builders should not be allowed to continue in existance. Further that the manufacturers of the various kits should be limited as to what they can provide in the kit as "prefabricated" parts. I invite you to look at www.eaa.org to get more particulars, or you can call me at 541-350-2901 and I will direct you towards more information on this vital subject. Joe Joseph C. Bartels, CEO Lancair International, Inc. --0-1712240456-1226282408=:48436 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Joe,
 
Can you link us to the exact document you are referring to that you want us to comment on?  I went to EAA's site and the instructions to comment are vague.
 
Thanks.
 
Matt

Joe Bartels <JoeB@lancair.com> wrote:
For those of you who have not commented on the proposed FAA "Major Portion" rule changes, seems as though the FAA forgot something or another and now has provided us with a further extension within which to comment.  There are a lot of you who have not commented on these onerous changes and I ask that you take the time to do so now!
 
The sum and substance of the FAA's proposed policy change is that commercial builders should not be allowed to continue in existance.  Further that the manufacturers of the various kits should be limited as to what they can provide in the kit as "prefabricated" parts.
 
I invite you to look at www.eaa.org to get more particulars, or you can call me at 541-350-2901 and I will direct you towards more information on this vital subject.
 
Joe
 
Joseph C. Bartels, CEO
Lancair International, Inc.

--0-1712240456-1226282408=:48436--