X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:10:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web55706.mail.re3.yahoo.com ([216.252.110.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.10) with SMTP id 3282482 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:13:22 -0500 Received: (qmail 99192 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Nov 2008 03:13:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=AWgR7jHWD1g/36u6/C1Btu+BxsQTf5xTkLbDhpefTqMevRP9H7X8dNUiTWPmYzKz1A/Cp4yPaXDZETOrDdWFDYd1kTXVvFut+AD/iAWDbLcd7Iw562J9HUFCqZryQAga8Mi1tV1bQpfK/AmgymivQm+JcJykLYAUaCqbM3kjzGM=; X-YMail-OSG: Vt0etEYVM1mE06U82dwOwNSZ3ROEqYJSDMjU8E2XDdKOARxjCiSK6e.DMg3_tvvuhqIGldxC5tIE5gLcKdA3B96luQSHY8CsMQAYO1ju6EQ.Ymz8kr1r9r86UI2TVq2czPpjur2ehGV5Ot1g8YFPNF28TiWfsufftXAYyZukgHbYuz_b1S9FWmFq6PKk Received: from [174.130.99.154] by web55706.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:13:21 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1155.32 YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 X-Original-Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 19:13:21 -0800 (PST) From: J H Webb Subject: Fw: [LML] Re: 235 Oleo Nose Strut X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1614102968-1226200401=:98599" X-Original-Message-ID: <17544.98599.qm@web55706.mail.re3.yahoo.com> --0-1614102968-1226200401=:98599 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brent,=0A=0AThere is one additional problem to consider, and that is the 23= 5 was a little short on rudder control and the later models have a longer f= uselage to improve the rudder power. The addition of a IO360 will make that= problem worse.=0A=A0=0AJack Webb=0AL360, LIV=0ABSAE=0AOhio=0A=0A----- Orig= inal Message ----- =0AFrom: Brent Elrod =0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net =0ASen= t: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 5:02 PM=0ASubject: [LML] 235 Oleo Nose Strut= =0A=0AI am asking for information concerning the pnuematic oleo=A0nose stru= t for a Lancair 235.=A0 I have been looking for a strut to convert my 235 f= rom the stiff dog leg style to the pneumatic one.=A0 I am confused as to wh= ich ones are the correct one.=A0 I understand some have poor centering capa= bility(early model) and some are from various manufacturers.=A0 I am sure s= ome of you have seen the one for sale on Ebay.=A0 Is the one of the good on= es or one to stay away from.=A0 I have the same question about the front no= se fork also.=A0 I intend to run an IO360 with c/prop if this has any beari= ng as to the weight.=A0 If any one has any information about this please le= t me know.=A0 I would like to obtain the right one the first time.=A0 Thank= s!=A0 Brent=0A=0A=0A --0-1614102968-1226200401=:98599 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Brent,
There is one additional problem to consider, and that is the 235 was a little short on rudder control and the later models have a longer fuselage to improve the rudder power. The addition of a IO360 will make that problem worse.
 
Jack Webb
L360, LIV
BSAE
Ohio
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 5:02 PM
Subject: [LML] 235 Oleo Nose Strut

I am asking for information concerning the pnuematic oleo nose strut for a Lancair 235.  I have been looking for a strut to convert my 235 from the stiff dog leg style to the pneumatic one.  I am confused as to which ones are the correct one.  I understand some have poor centering capability(early model) and some are from various manufacturers.  I am sure some of you have seen the one for sale on Ebay.  Is the one of the good ones or one to stay away from.  I have the same question about the front nose fork also.  I intend to run an IO360 with c/prop if this has any bearing as to the weight.  If any one has any information about this please let me know.  I would like to obtain the right one the first time.  Thanks!  Brent

--0-1614102968-1226200401=:98599--