X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:21:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from outbound-mail.vgs.untd.com ([64.136.55.15] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with SMTP id 3048227 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:32:59 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.55.15; envelope-from=jkezele@juno.com X-UOL-TAGLINE: true Received: from outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com (webmail16.vgs.untd.com [10.181.12.156]) by smtpout06.vgs.untd.com with SMTP id AABEKA5L6AJBSQL2 for (sender ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:32:12 -0700 (PDT) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: 9OvJUXd2tUqhLb258iQtPZv2tJIn+VoR5Qk8G8R+5pgq47yqDpycuA== Received: (from jkezele@juno.com) by webmail16.vgs.untd.com (jqueuemail) id NRCRQZMT; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:31:47 PDT Received: from [207.225.33.147] by webmail16.vgs.untd.com with HTTP: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:30:50 GMT X-Originating-IP: [207.225.33.147] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "jkezele@juno.com" X-Original-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:30:50 GMT X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: RE:FAA comment on new 51% A/B Ruling X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 X-Original-Message-Id: <20080730.073050.5825.0@webmail16.vgs.untd.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 X-ContentStamp: 2:2:1420475135 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.181.12.156|webmail16.vgs.untd.com|outbound-bu1.vgs.untd.com|jkezele@juno.com John, I support your ideas and feelings concerning the 51% ruling. I am curren= tly finishing a Lancair 360 that I purchase from another builder. As a = Board member of the Classic Jet Aircraft Association (CJAA), I can tell = you that we are working hard to express our concerns about changes the F= AA wants to make in the Experiment Exhibition category. We are finding = there is an old theme only with more vigor .... "REGULATE, REGULATE, REG= ULATE." This is not the only place that I am seeing a revival in the FA= A. In fact, last week prior to an airshow that I was flying in, FAA ins= pectors saw my aircraft in a hanger having a pitot static check. They t= ook the liberty of going through my logbooks with out me being present. = All was well but this in my opinion is quite aggressive. Now this may = be an isolated incident, but they also enforced "essential crew only" fo= r the airshow. We have flown with a spotter in our rear seat for years,= if there is more then one aircraft in the air at the same time, especia= lly if there is more than 200kts difference in airspeed. One of the FAA= 's concerns on this issue was liability ... what if the aircraft crashed= ... there would be two dead instead of one. This pressure to regulate and enforce is coming down from congress. If = we want to get anything done, or our voices heard, it will not happen by= writing or working with the FAA. The CJAA has taken this approach for = years with little results. Our conclusion, take our concerns to Washing= ton. Of course, as you all know this takes money! Regards, John Kezele Still building 51% = ____________________________________________________________ Free information on Internet Security. Click Now. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3mEWrbCYqQBp0Vu5RbotVo= q2yd2pjrXBeAelc4vE6WDnMD8d/