X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:30:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web36601.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.85.18] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with SMTP id 3041404 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:35:39 -0400 Received: (qmail 59831 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jul 2008 05:35:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=nlshU3iyBM8Bn0750fCe07Db81p3L5k9t1+XHFYy56z5FPc3YSYokXRpNKeZcz0ToTIo2aaTL+LIkILhMtMBrd8L4NkmKmExutSImE4Id+k4iOQe+jtMu0ZlgqlIj+xauDGfirxXBU6u6KhlhG9C0R8apJVeztWm12WloBoV864=; Received: from [71.208.14.189] by web36601.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:35:39 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218 X-Original-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:35:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Hannahan Reply-To: wfhannahan@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 320 vs 360 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-691889130-1216964139=:18521" X-Original-Message-ID: <721079.18521.qm@web36601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-691889130-1216964139=:18521 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill, Impressive #'s. Was head temp are you running in that regime and also are you ROP or LOP? RS I leaned to rough than enrichened to "almost smooth".=20 Temps were low, at 4.4 gph there is not much heat. --- On Tue, 7/8/08, Bill Hannahan wrote: From: Bill Hannahan Subject: [LML] 320 vs 360 To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 8:33 AM The Lycoming performance charts show that the 360 can make 100 hp at a lower rpm and lower fuel flow than the 320. =A0=20 A few weeks ago I ran the 360 in the Fuelventure competition at Meadowlake near Colorado Springs . I came in fourth overall after three Variez=92s. it did 37.8 mpg around a triangular course of 378 miles=20 at 168 mph (4.44 gph). =A0=20 I flew at about 140- 150 mph indicated and adjusted altitude with power. The power setting in level flight was around 16.5=94 at 1500 rpm, wh= ich is well off the chart. =A0=20 It is a stock 360 A1A with mags and carb turning the old 2 blade Hartzel. =A0=20 They are planning on taking it to Copper=20 State fly in. I highly recommend it, they are a good bunch of guys engaged in friendly competition. =A0=20 Regards, Bill Hannahan =20 wfhannahan@yahoo.com =20 =0A=0A=0A --0-691889130-1216964139=:18521 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
Bill,=
Impressive #'s.
Was head temp are you running in that regime and als= o are you ROP or LOP?
RS


I leaned to rough than enrichened to= "almost smooth".

Temps were low, at 4.4 gph there is not much heat= .


--- On Tue, 7/8/08, Bill Hannahan <wfhannahan@yahoo.c= om> wrote:
From: Bill Hannahan <wfhannahan@yahoo.com>
Subject: [LML] 320 vs 360
To: lml@lanca= ironline.net
Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 8:33 AM

<= tr>

The Lycoming performance charts show that the 360 ca= n make 100 hp at a lower rpm and lower fuel flow than the 320.

 

=20

A few weeks ago I ran the 360 in the Fuelventure com= petition at Meadowlake near Colorado Springs . I came in fourth overall after three Variez=92s. it did 37.8 mpg around a triangular course of 378 miles=20 at 168 mph (4.44 gph).

 

=20

I flew at about 140- 150 mph indicated and adjusted altitude with power. The power setting in level flight was around 16.5=94 at 1500 rpm, wh= ich is well off the chart.

 

=20

It is a stock 360 A1A with mags and carb turning the= old 2 blade Hartzel.

 

=20

They are planning on taking it to Copper=20 State fly in. I highly recommend it, they are a good bunch of guys engaged in friendly competition.

 

=20

Regards,
Bill Hannahan



=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-691889130-1216964139=:18521--