X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:00:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web54403.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.49.133] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.5) with SMTP id 3016473 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:03:02 -0400 Received: (qmail 17935 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jul 2008 16:03:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=O+W9/b6yaBkd4cMYj8yMjQVU4SiCWdEMXg3+eSGDdLRFtBmcco6uIqkFmJ3vNHVOaw3D/1vOcT7RvL6yy6dqoQRqn3MOvna8FhDrqt4OeYmfMTJ8asILLlM45TK2JeR7ZWeZkogIhHBECUV3M6lWz746/yuUzHuV/dJu/Yc9ang=; Received: from [208.187.197.66] by web54403.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:02:58 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.199 X-Original-Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:02:58 -0700 (PDT) From: randy snarr Reply-To: randylsnarr@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [LML] 320 vs 360 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1105272277-1215532978=:15018" X-Original-Message-ID: <974316.15018.qm@web54403.mail.yahoo.com> --0-1105272277-1215532978=:15018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill, Impressive #'s. Was head temp are you running in that regime and also are you ROP or LOP? RS --- On Tue, 7/8/08, Bill Hannahan wrote: From: Bill Hannahan Subject: [LML] 320 vs 360 To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008, 8:33 AM The Lycoming performance charts show that the 360 can make 100 hp at a lower rpm and lower fuel flow than the 320. =A0=20 A few weeks ago I ran the 360 in the Fuelventure competition at Meadowlake near Colorado Springs . I came in fourth overall after three Variez=92s. it did 37.8 mpg around a triangular course of 378 miles=20 at 168 mph (4.44 gph). =A0=20 I flew at about 140- 150 mph indicated and adjusted altitude with power. The power setting in level flight was around 16.5=94 at 1500 rpm, wh= ich is well off the chart. =A0=20 It is a stock 360 A1A with mags and carb turning the old 2 blade Hartzel. =A0=20 They are planning on taking it to Copper=20 State fly in. I highly recommend it, they are a good bunch of guys engaged in friendly competition. =A0=20 Regards, Bill Hannahan =20 wfhannahan@yahoo.com =0A=0A=0A --0-1105272277-1215532978=:15018 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bill,
Impressive #'s.
Was head temp are= you running in that regime and also are you ROP or LOP?
RS

--- O= n Tue, 7/8/08, Bill Hannahan <wfhannahan@yahoo.com> wro= te:
From: Bill Hannahan <wfhannahan@yahoo.co= m>
Subject: [LML] 320 vs 360
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tu= esday, July 8, 2008, 8:33 AM

The Lycoming performance charts show that the 360 ca= n make 100 hp at a lower rpm and lower fuel flow than the 320.

 

=20

A few weeks ago I ran the 360 in the Fuelventure com= petition at Meadowlake near Colorado Springs . I came in fourth overall after three Variez=92s. it did 37.8 mpg around a triangular course of 378 miles=20 at 168 mph (4.44 gph).

 

=20

I flew at about 140- 150 mph indicated and adjusted altitude with power. The power setting in level flight was around 16.5=94 at 1500 rpm, wh= ich is well off the chart.

 

=20

It is a stock 360 A1A with mags and carb turning the= old 2 blade Hartzel.

 

=20

They are planning on taking it to Copper=20 State fly in. I highly recommend it, they are a good bunch of guys engaged in friendly competition.

 

=20

Regards,
Bill Hannahan


=0A=0A --0-1105272277-1215532978=:15018--