X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 00:06:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from asp-3.reflexion.net ([205.237.99.178] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.4) with SMTP id 2995516 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:51:59 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.237.99.178; envelope-from=cberland@systems3.net Received: (qmail 19142 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2008 15:51:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO asp-3.reflexion.net) (127.0.0.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 28 Jun 2008 15:51:19 -0000 Received: by asp-3.reflexion.net (Reflexion email security v5.40.3) with SMTP; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:51:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 19131 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2008 15:51:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO systems3.net) (98.172.79.178) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 28 Jun 2008 15:51:19 -0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8D936.CDD9F140" Subject: [LML] Re: IV-P crash (N101BX) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:51:09 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <87C33F695961494D886EB3B6C8A476514F73F8@s3server.Systems3.local> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: IV-P crash (N101BX) Thread-Index: AcjYreELcORJ99zqQuiKq4tV2bYH8wAh6F8w References: From: "Craig Berland" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8D936.CDD9F140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jeff, I can only hope they are "considering the option to not renew IV-P policies". Additionally, I am not very pleased with some of the "casual" comments I have heard coming out of Lancair lately. I would hope the game plan to promote the Evolution does not include "throwing the IV under the bus". =20 Craig Berland =20 =20 In flight break up? Thunderstorm penetration? AIG is not happy with latest round of IV accidents and is "not renewing" our policies. =20 Fly safe. =20 Jeff=20 =20 In a message dated 6/26/2008 8:51:20 P.M. Central Daylight Time, liegner@embarqmail.com writes: I'm guessing that there was an ice induced tail stall ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8D936.CDD9F140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jeff, I can = only hope=20 they are "considering the option to not renew IV-P policies". =20 Additionally, I am not very pleased with some of the "casual" comments I = have=20 heard coming out of Lancair lately. I would hope the game plan to = promote=20 the Evolution does not include "throwing the IV under the = bus".

Craig=20 Berland

In flight break up?=20 Thunderstorm penetration? AIG is not happy with latest round of IV = accidents and=20 is "not renewing" our policies.

Fly safe.

Jeff

In a message dated 6/26/2008 8:51:20 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 liegner@embarqmail.com writes:

I'm guessing that there was an = ice=20 induced tail = stall

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8D936.CDD9F140--