X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 22:57:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.2) with ESMTP id 2881007 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 May 2008 21:57:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.1; envelope-from=tom.gourley@verizon.net Received: from jacky0da39824a ([71.111.168.41]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0K0700I1FXDUPNJ1@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 May 2008 20:56:21 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 18:56:14 -0700 From: "Tom Gourley" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lightspeed Plasma III in Performance Engine X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Reply-to: "Tom Gourley" X-Original-Message-id: <001601c8abf7$b49032c0$650610ac@jacky0da39824a> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01C8ABBD.0766B7C0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C8ABBD.0766B7C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Conclusion: Lightspeed fires through ugly fouled plugs better than a = magneto, just as advertised. So this might be a benefit in starting if = your plugs are somewhat fouled. Doesn't Lightspeed use an automotive type plug instead of the massive = electrode plugs typically used with mags? I was just wondering if the = automotive plug is less prone to fouling. The Lightspeed probably does = fire through better, but unless the plug configuration is the same on = the Lightspeed and the mag it seems like the results could be a little = misleading. Tom Gourley ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C8ABBD.0766B7C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Conclusion:=20 Lightspeed fires through ugly fouled plugs better than a magneto, just = as=20 advertised.  So this might be a benefit in starting if your plugs = are=20 somewhat fouled.
 
Doesn't Lightspeed use an automotive type plug instead of the = massive=20 electrode plugs typically used with mags?  I was just wondering if = the=20 automotive plug is less prone to fouling.  The Lightspeed probably = does=20 fire through better, but unless the plug configuration is the same on = the=20 Lightspeed and the mag it seems like the results could be a little=20 misleading.
 
Tom Gourley
 
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01C8ABBD.0766B7C0--