X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:14:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [132.241.82.183] (HELO cerberus.csuchico.edu) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.2) with ESMTPS id 2878426 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:13:48 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=132.241.82.183; envelope-from=DMccune@csuchico.edu Received: from Torrey.csuchico.edu (torrey.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.82.60]) by chimera.csuchico.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3UFD6NS003540 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:13:07 -0700 Received: from ESCHE.csuchico.edu ([132.241.82.81]) by Torrey.csuchico.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:13:07 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8AAD4.B1888EFC" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: limit Gs for 235 (kit #11) X-Original-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:13:06 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <9ADE954C5044754C8E0BF406B5A2175527C152F2@ESCHE.csuchico.edu> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: limit Gs for 235 (kit #11) Thread-Index: Acg14p2bDn+NyDOwR1iT5Y2nrvyseR08hJwg References: From: "McCune, Duane" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Apr 2008 15:13:07.0113 (UTC) FILETIME=[B1B2C190:01C8AAD4] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=4.65.7161:2.4.4,1.2.40,4.0.164 definitions=2008-04-30_06:2008-04-29,2008-04-30,2008-04-30 signatures=0 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8AAD4.B1888EFC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Tim J=F8rgensen Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:28 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: limit Gs for 235 (kit #11) =09 =09 "Do I understand that you imply the 300-series wing that was load = tested is the same as the 200's?" =20 The 235 and 320/360 wings are structurally VERY different. I am building a 360 and a friend of mine is building a 235, so I have = seen both wings in disassembeled state. The spar caps on the 235 are only about 2/3 as thick as the 320/360, = which translates to a lot less carbonfiber. =20 Since anything we build in this country has to be thoroughly tried, = tested and documented, both of us needed factory verification of our = data for the wing load test. The factory (Ross) gave us the following numbers: =20 L-235, max. GW 1400 lbs. This figure was never and will never be = raised. L-320/360 max. take off weight 1790 lbs., max. landing weight 1685 lbs. = The take off weight was raised from the original 1685 lbs. to 1790 lbs. = and this is the absolute max. weight at which the plane can be flown = safely ( I asked for 1800 lbs.). =20 Regards Tim Jorgensen Denmark 360MKIIOBFB / 65%=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C8AAD4.B1888EFC Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 

From: Lancair Mailing List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tim=20 J=F8rgensen
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:28 = AM
To:=20 lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: limit Gs for 235 = (kit=20 #11)

"Do I understand=20 that you imply the 300-series wing that was load tested is the same as = the=20 200's?"
 
The 235 and 320/360 = wings are=20 structurally VERY different.
I am building a 360 = and a friend of=20 mine is building a 235, so I have seen both wings = in disassembeled=20 state.
The spar caps on the = 235 are only=20 about 2/3 as thick as the 320/360, which translates to a lot less=20 carbonfiber.
 
Since anything we = build in this=20 country has to be thoroughly tried, tested and documented, both = of us=20 needed factory verification of our data for the wing load=20 test.
The = factory (Ross) gave us the=20 following numbers:
 
L-235, max. GW 1400 = lbs. This=20 figure was never and will never be raised.
L-320/360 max. take = off=20 weight 1790 lbs., max. landing weight 1685 lbs. The take off = weight was=20 raised from the original 1685 lbs. to 1790 lbs. and this is the = absolute max.=20 weight at which the plane can be flown safely ( I asked for 1800=20 lbs.).
 
Regards
Tim = Jorgensen
Denmark
360MKIIOBFB /=20 65% 
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8AAD4.B1888EFC--