X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:23:27 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.1) with ESMTP id 2836578 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 21:22:39 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.182.184; envelope-from=akadamson@gmail.com Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 30so839283nfu.27 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:22:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:x-mimeole:in-reply-to:thread-index:sender; b=FuLTsYXz++bYam120kB1co+I0kMgojEDwQk6pljLQqHBCxcJiu1BPfEzbGVKRqEQfDVXOhFXpxXtbAQ/wH+qUQpevCcz8PiYURdSBQ7qU1K7vXGZI00qdKpyjslvBfUOrZ0kzu9d+Dxv7qRsIN/Y0zj9IdjHvQy4KBiMqsveetM= Received: by 10.150.216.8 with SMTP id o8mr3074448ybg.138.1207617718982; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:21:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from Typhoon ( [76.97.53.219]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm13328815ywf.2.2008.04.07.18.21.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:21:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Alan Adamson" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: legacy exhaust heat shield option X-Original-Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 21:21:57 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <012601c89916$f08271b0$0501a8c0@highrf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0127_01C898F5.6970D1B0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AciZFgRE0ZqDrn4/SdumjfODUfErPQAAIC/Q X-Original-Sender: Alan Adamson This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0127_01C898F5.6970D1B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I guess I'm confused, isn't the issue one of not the material, but more so stopping the darkening of the paint, and associated exhaust stain... And isn't that why people where interested in the stainless version? After all, this isn't a *heat* isolation issue, the blanket does that quite nicely. It's all about looks and keeping the looks perfect. I know of no way to do that with another composite piece. It's either metal or nothing to resolve the primary issue that most are trying to address with the Legacy exhaust tunnels... Or do I have it all wrong? Alan _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of larry.eversmeyer@faa.gov Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:04 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: legacy exhaust heat shield option 2. How many of you would be interested in carbon carbon exhaust heat shields instead of the stainless steel? I assume you are referring to where the exhaust comes out in the back of the cowling and below the fuselage. I would be interested in a set. Still building Larry Eversmeyer "Russell" Sent by: "Lancair Mailing List" 04/04/2008 09:00 PM Please respond to "Lancair Mailing List" To lml@lancaironline.net cc Subject [LML] legacy exhaust heat shield option I have been doing some investigation and found that it is probable to manufacture exhaust heat shields out of Carbon Carbon. What I like to know who is the following. 1. Does someone have a flying legacy and is willing to help with some data that we need. I would be happy to compensate you for your time. 2. How many of you would be interested in carbon carbon exhaust heat shields instead of the stainless steel? Once we obtain the data I need from a flying legacy and confirm the numbers for the temperature ranges. The production could start very shortly. Russell ------=_NextPart_000_0127_01C898F5.6970D1B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I guess I'm confused, isn't the issue one of = not the=20 material, but more so stopping the darkening of the paint, and = associated=20 exhaust stain... And isn't that why people where interested in the = stainless=20 version?  After all, this isn't a *heat* isolation issue, the = blanket does=20 that quite nicely.  It's all about looks and keeping the looks=20 perfect.  I know of no way to do that with another composite = piece. =20 It's either metal or nothing to resolve the primary issue that most are = trying=20 to address with the Legacy exhaust tunnels...
 
Or do I have it all wrong?
 
Alan

From: Lancair Mailing List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of=20 larry.eversmeyer@faa.gov
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:04 = PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: = legacy=20 exhaust heat shield option


2.   =    =20 How many of you would be interested in carbon carbon exhaust heat = shields=20 instead of the stainless steel?  I assume you are = referring to=20 where the exhaust comes out in the back of the cowling and below the = fuselage.=20  I would be interested in a set.  Still building =

Larry Eversmeyer


"Russell"=20 <N2AA@bellsouth.net>
Sent by: "Lancair Mailing List"=20 <lml@lancaironline.net>=20

04/04/2008 09:00 PM=20
Please = respond=20 to
"Lancair Mailing List"=20 = <lml@lancaironline.net>
To
lml@lancaironline.net=20
cc
Subject
[LML] legacy exhaust heat = shield=20 option

=




I have been doing some investigation and found that it is = probable to=20 manufacture exhaust heat shields out of Carbon Carbon. What I = like to=20 know who is the following.
 =20
1.       Does someone = have a flying=20 legacy and is willing to help with some data that we need.  I would = be=20 happy to compensate you for your time.
2.=20       How many of you would be interested in carbon = carbon=20 exhaust heat shields instead of the stainless steel?
 
Once we obtain=20 the data I need from a flying legacy and confirm the numbers for the = temperature=20 ranges.  The production could start very shortly.
 
Russell=20
------=_NextPart_000_0127_01C898F5.6970D1B0--