X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:49:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2759114 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:06:08 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.48; envelope-from=lyleap@comcast.net Received: from OMTA14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uHSj1Y00g1HzFnQ550RB00; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:04:48 +0000 Received: from server ([24.118.239.154]) by OMTA14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id uS5R1Y0043LaBGg3a00000; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:05:26 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=NRNn9UAs94asRwEWAPUA:9 a=sjVuo0A5tqRLku-VMLoA:7 a=BDSK57WOozxp46ggHJuhU8uswfsA:4 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=5WZzfXpOq_gA:10 a=JYH6_Giy_kNa8jl73yYA:7 a=JBk79p1BWop9i37zR9o-T9eg4uwA:4 a=AfD3MYMu9mQA:10 From: "Lyle Peterson" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: 51% Rule X-Original-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:07:29 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0206_01C878B3.37876B80" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: Ach43g3S2ubw06btSPeJe0qmGJB76wABmdAg Disposition-Notification-To: "Lyle Peterson" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C878B3.37876B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In addition, I fail to understand what people are trying to say when the state, "I could care less..." =20 =20 If the don't care then the "couldn't care less." They could not care = any less about the topic. =20 If they "could care less" they are saying they care but something could convince them to not care as much or they "could care less." =20 =20 Thank you, =20 Lyle Peterson Chairman, Blaine Aviation Days May 17 and 18 Anoka County Airport (ANE) Blaine, Minnesota =20 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Gary Edwards Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 7:14 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: 51% Rule =20 >>>The following is my 2 cents worth:<<< =20 =20 Why do you have to "put your two cents in".. But it's only a "penny for = your thoughts"? Where's that extra penny going to? =20 Gary E=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C878B3.37876B80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In addition, I fail to understand = what people are trying to say when the state, “I could care = less…..”

If the don’t care then the = “couldn’t care less.” They could not care any less about the = topic.

If they “could care = less” they are saying they care but something could convince them to not care as = much or they “could care less.”

Thank you,

Lyle = Peterson

Chairman, Blaine Aviation Days

May 17 and 18

Anoka County Airport (ANE)

Blaine, Minnesota

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing = List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of Gary Edwards
Sent: Tuesday, February = 26, 2008 7:14 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: 51% = Rule

>>>Th= e following is my 2 cents worth:<<<

<= /font>

Why do = you have to "put your two cents in".. But it's only a "penny for = your thoughts"? Where's that extra penny going = to?

<= /font>

Gary = E

------=_NextPart_000_0206_01C878B3.37876B80--